ArticleNature biotechnology2018
Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Predictors of Morbidity, Hospitalization, and Mortality Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Pooled it
- Brain-Hype and For-Profit Medical Devices.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Advancing neurotech justice in youth digital mental health: insights from an interdisciplinary and cross-generational workshop.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Revisiting big data optimism: risks of data-driven black box algorithms for society.Ethics and information technology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Marriage of Neurotechnologies and Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, regulatory, and technological aspects.IEEE signal processing magazine · 2025Article
- Ethical gaps in closed-loop neurotechnology: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- From neurotechnology to the classroom: the promise of brain-computer interfaces for training systems engineers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Article
- Brain2GAN: Feature-disentangled neural encoding and decoding of visual perception in the primate brain.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Electrical and Magnetic Neuromodulation Technologies and Brain-Computer Interfaces: Ethical Considerations for Enhancement of Brain Function in Healthy People - A Systematic Scoping Review.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations for integrating multimodal computer perception and neurotechnology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Paving the Way for Motor Imagery-Based Tele-Rehabilitation through a Fully Wearable BCI System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations.Journal of child neurology · 2023Review
- How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation.Science and engineering ethics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.