Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30188337›Full record

ReviewHarvard review of psychiatry

Interoception in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials with Interoception-Based Interventions.

Nayla M Khoury, Jacqueline Lutz, Zev Schuman-Olivier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nayla M KhouryFrom Harvard Medical School; Department of Psychiatry (Dr. Khoury) and Center for Mindfulness and Compassion (Drs. Lutz and Schuman-Olivier), Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA; University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA (Dr. Khoury).
Jacqueline Lutz
Zev Schuman-Olivier
Cambridge Health Alliance · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Mindfulness Influences on Self-Regulation: Mental and Physical Health ImplicationsUH2AT009145 · NCCIH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRITTON, WILLOUGHBY, KING, JEAN A · 2015 to 2017
$2.7M
Mindfulness Influences on Self-Regulation: Mental and Physical Health ImplicationsUH3AT009145 · NCCIH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRITTON, WILLOUGHBY, KING, JEAN A · 2018 to 2019
$2.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT009145NCCIH NIH HHS UH3 AT009145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoception, or the process of sensing, interpreting, and integrating internal bodily signals, has increasingly been the subject of scientific research over the past decade but is still not well known in clinical practice. The aim of this article is to review clinical treatment interventions that use interoception, to synthesize the current research knowledge, and to identify the gaps where future research is needed. We conducted a comprehensive literature search on randomized, controlled trials that both include interoception in treatment interventions for individuals with psychiatric disorders and measure aspects of interoception using self-report measures. Out of 14 randomized, controlled trials identified, 7 found that interventions with interoception were effective in ameliorating symptoms. These studies included individuals with anxiety disorders, eating disorders, psychosomatic disorders, and addictive disorders. All of the intervention studies with positive clinical outcomes also demonstrated changes on interoceptive measures; however, these measures were often related to specific illness symptoms. Interoception may be a mechanism of action in improving clinical symptomatology, though studies incorporating general, symptom-independent interoceptive measures remain scarce. To further our understanding of the role interoception has in psychiatric disorders and their treatment, more studies integrating interoceptive measures are needed, along with a clearer definition of interoceptive terms used.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansInteroceptionMental DisordersPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30188337
PMCPMC6129986
OpenAlexW2890773050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.