Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30188320›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Receptive field center-surround interactions mediate context-dependent spatial contrast encoding in the retina.

Maxwell H Turner, Gregory W Schwartz, Fred Rieke

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Compartmentalized pooling generates orientation selectivity in wide-field amacrine cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pattern forming mechanisms of color vision.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Systematic reduction of the dimensionality of natural scenes allows accurate predictions of retinal ganglion cell spike outputs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxwell H TurnerDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4164-9995
Gregory W SchwartzDepartments of Ophthalmology and Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.
Fred RiekeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-2609

Funding

BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF SINGLE PHOTON DETECTIONR01EY011850 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Mechanisms controlling retinal responses to natural stimuliR01EY028542 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FREDERICK M RIEKE · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
Retinal ganglion cell receptive field form and function during natural viewingF31EY026288 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TURNER, MAXWELL HOLTE · 2016 to 2017
$62k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS EY028542NEI NIH HHS EY11850NEI NIH HHS F31 EY026288NEI NIH HHS F31-EY026288NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antagonistic receptive field surrounds are a near-universal property of early sensory processing. A key assumption in many models for retinal ganglion cell encoding is that receptive field surrounds are added only to the fully formed center signal. But anatomical and functional observations indicate that surrounds are added before the summation of signals across receptive field subunits that creates the center. Here, we show that this receptive field architecture has an important consequence for spatial contrast encoding in the macaque monkey retina: the surround can control sensitivity to fine spatial structure by changing the way the center integrates visual information over space. The impact of the surround is particularly prominent when center and surround signals are correlated, as they are in natural stimuli. This effect of the surround differs substantially from classic center-surround models and raises the possibility that the surround plays unappreciated roles in shaping ganglion cell sensitivity to natural inputs.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast SensitivityHumansMacacaModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsPhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual Fieldsnatural scenesneurosciencenonhuman primatereceptive Fieldretinal ganglion cellrhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID30188320
PMCPMC6185113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.