ArticleTopics in stroke rehabilitation2018
The difficulty of studying race-ethnic stroke rehabilitation disparities in a community.
Article in Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMinority populations have worse stroke outcomes compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). One possible explanation for this disparity is differential allocation of stroke rehabilitation. We utilized a population-based stroke study to determine the feasibility of studying Mexican American-NHW differences in stroke rehabilitation in a population-based design including identification of community partners, development of standardized data collection instruments, and collection of pilot data.
methodsAs part of the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project, we followed 48 patients for the first 90 days after stroke, and attempted to work with community partners to garner information on rehabilitation modalities used. With input from local occupational and physical therapists and speech language pathologists, we created data collection forms to capture rehabilitation activities and time spent on these activities and conducted a 3-month data collection pilot.
resultsOf the 79 rehabilitation venues in the community, 63 (80%) agreed to participate. During the pilot, 545 data forms from 20 stroke patients were collected corresponding to ~18% of stroke patients. Forms were used by 13 partners during the pilot including 3 of 4 inpatient rehabilitation facilities, 4 of 13 skilled nursing facilities, 4 of 26 home health agencies, and 2 of 36 outpatient rehabilitation providers.
conclusionsInitial agreement from rehabilitation providers to participate in research was excellent, but completion of study related data collection forms was sub-optimal suggesting this approach is not feasible for a future population-based stroke rehabilitation study. Further methods to study post-stroke rehabilitation disparities in communities are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.