ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018
Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-Lapse Imaging in IVF: Bridging the Gap Between Promises and Clinical Realities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Survey ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- The efficacy of add-ons: selected IVF "add-on" procedures and future directions.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Review
- Current Advancements in Noninvasive Profiling of the Embryo Culture Media Secretome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technologyHuman reproduction open · 2020Article
- Developmental perturbation in human embryos: Clinical and biological significance learned from time-lapse images.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough the clinical value of time-lapse imaging (TLI) systems in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is still debated, its prevalence worldwide seems to be expanding. The situation of TLI in the USA has been recently surveyed, but these results might not be transposable to other countries with different IVF regulation and funding such as France. This study evaluated the TLI situation in French IVF laboratories.
methodsAn anonymous online cross-sectional survey was sent by email to 210 embryologists in September and October 2017. Laboratories, demographics, TLI clinical use, purchasing plan, and embryologists' opinions were analyzed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratio.
resultsOf the 210 lab directors surveyed, 78 responded (37.1%), 43 (55%) working in private IVF laboratories and 35 (45%) in public hospitals. Thirty (38.5%) were TLI users. The odds of TLI possession were not statistically different according to laboratory sector or size. Most embryologists (n = 21, 70%) used TLI for unselected patients. Cost was the main reason given by non-users for not implementing TLI (n = 24, 50%). Most respondents were convinced that TLI is superior to standard morphology (n = 52, 73.2%) and that TLI improves culture conditions (n = 62, 84.9%). However, half (n = 39, 54.9%) indicated that evidence was still lacking to assert TLI clinical usefulness.
conclusionThe prevalence of TLI systems and embryologists' opinion in France was slightly different from the American situation. The different regulation and funding policy might account for some differences in terms of TLI use and perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.