Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187410›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

The effect of cellulose production waste and municipal sewage sludge on biomass and heavy metal uptake by a plant mixture.

Jacek Antonkiewicz, Robert Pełka, Marta Bik-Małodzińska, Grażyna Żukowska, Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolic Profiles ofMetabolites · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacek AntonkiewiczDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland. rrantonk@cyf-kr.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-2119
Robert PełkaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
Marta Bik-MałodzińskaInstitute of Soil Science, Environment Engineering and Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Grażyna ŻukowskaInstitute of Soil Science, Environment Engineering and Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Gleń-KarolczykDepartment of Agricultural Environment Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
University of Agriculture in Krakow · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland Subject 3101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental management of cellulose production waste and municipal sewage sludge appears to be substantiated due to various physicochemical properties of these wastes. The aim of the conducted research was to determine the effect of cellulose production waste and sewage sludge on yielding and heavy metal uptake by a plant mixture. The research was conducted under field experiment conditions, determining the fertilizer value of these wastes in the environmental aspect. The research was carried out in the years 2013-2016. Species composition of the plant mixture was adjusted to habitat conditions. It was established that, as compared with the cellulose production waste, the municipal sewage sludge used in the experiment had a higher content of macroelements. The content of heavy metals in the studied waste did not exceed the limits that condition their use in agriculture and reclamation. Applying only the cellulose production waste did not significantly decrease the yield of the plants. Municipal sewage sludge showed the highest yield-forming effect. Mixing the above-mentioned wastes and their application to soil had a significant effect on the increase in the plant mixture yield. The waste applied to soil also increased the content of Cr, Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn in the plant mix. The level of heavy metal content in the plant mix did not exclude this biomass from being used for fodder or reclamation purposes. The cellulose production waste and municipal sewage sludge increased the heavy metal uptake by the plant mixture. The plant biomass extracted heavy metals from the sewage sludge more intensively than from the cellulose production waste. Among the analyzed heavy metals, the highest phytoremediation was recorded for Ni (30%), followed by Cd (20%), Cr (15%), Pb (10%), and the lowest for Cu (9%) and Zn (8%). Application of the cellulose production waste and sewage sludge to soil also increased the content of the studied heavy metals in soil. However, it did not cause deterioration of soil quality standards. Heterogeneity in the chemical composition of the wastes confirms that each batch intended to be used for environmental management should be subjected to chemical control.

Indexed as

CelluloseFertilizersSewageWaste ProductsAgricultureBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassMetals, HeavyPlantsSoil PollutantsCelluloseFertilizersMetals, HeavySewageSoil PollutantsWaste ProductsCellulose production wasteHeavy metalsMunicipal sewage sludgePhytoremediationPlant mixture

Identifiers

PMID30187410
OpenAlexW2892296556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.