Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187376›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

A Comparison of Electronic Patient-Portal Use Among Patients with Resident and Attending Primary Care Providers.

Brian Chan, Courtney Lyles, Celia Kaplan, Rosemary Lam, Leah Karliner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian ChanDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road L475, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA. chanbri@ohsu.edu.
Courtney LylesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Celia KaplanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rosemary LamDivision of General Internal Medicine, Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Leah KarlinerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USOregon Health & Science University · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient PortalR00HS022408 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2015 to 2017
$740k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981AHRQ HHS R00 HS022408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic patient-portals offer the potential to enhance patient-physician communication and health outcomes but differential use may create or worsen disparities. While prior studies identified patient characteristics associated with patient-portal use, the role of physician factors is less known. We investigated differences in overall and patterns of portal use for patients with resident and attending primary care providers (PCPs).

methodsCross-sectional study of all established patients with a resident or attending PCP seen at an academic internal medicine practice (two sites) between May 1, 2014, and April 30, 2015. We defined patient-portal use as having accessed any "active" (secure messaging, medication refill request), or "passive" (viewing labs, after visit summaries, or appointments) patient-portal function more than once over the study period. We used generalized linear models clustered on PCP to examine the odds of patient-portal use by PCP type, adjusted for patient age, gender, preferred language, race/ethnicity, insurance, and visits. Among patient-portal users, we examined the association of PCP type with "active use" utilizing the same method.

resultsThe mean patient age (n = 17,699) was 54.2 (SD 17.5), with 47.2% White, 23.6% Asian, 8.8% Black, 8.4% Latino, and 12% other/unknown. The majority (61.8%) had private insurance, and attending PCPs (76.9%). Although 72.3% enrolled in the patient-portal, only 53.4% were portal users; 40.0% were active users. There were 47 attending and 62 resident physicians. Patients with resident PCPs had lower odds of using the portal compared to those with attending PCPs (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59). Similarly, among portal users, residents' patients had lower odds of being active users of the portal (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.87).

conclusionGiven the lower patient-portal use among residents' patients, residency programs should develop curricula to bolster trainee competence in using the patient-portal for communication and to enhance the patient-physician relationship. Future research should explore additional physician factors that impact portal use.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedPatient PortalsPhysicians, Primary Caredisparitiespatient-portalphysician-patient communicationresident training

Identifiers

PMID30187376
PMCPMC6258601
OpenAlexW2890737232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.