Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187374›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Emergency Department Care for Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lucy Schulson, Victor Novack, Peter B Smulowitz, Tenzin Dechen, Bruce E Landon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Professional Interpreter Use in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy SchulsonDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Victor NovackCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter B SmulowitzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tenzin DechenCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Bruce E LandonDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. landon@hcp.harvard.edu.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited English proficiency (LEP) patients may be particularly vulnerable in the high acuity and fast-paced setting of the emergency department (ED).

objectiveTo compare the care processes of LEP patients in the ED.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingED in a large tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult LEP and English Proficient (EP) patients during their index presentation to the ED from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015. LEP patients were identified as those who selected a preferred language other than English when registering for care. MAIN MEASURES: Rates of diagnostic studies, admission, and return visits for those originally discharged from the ED. KEY

resultsWe studied 57,435 visits of which 5241 (9.1%) were for patients with LEP. In adjusted analyses, LEP patients were more likely to receive an X-ray/ultrasound (OR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.19) and be admitted to the hospital (OR 1.09, CI 1.01-1.19). There was no difference in 72-h return visits (OR 0.98, CI 0.73-1.33). LEP patients presenting with complaints related to the cardiovascular system were more likely to receive a stress test (OR 1.51, CI 1.22-1.86), and those with gastrointestinal diagnoses were more likely to have an X-ray/ultrasound (OR 1.31, CI 1.02-1.68). In stratified analyses, Spanish speakers were less likely to be admitted (OR 0.8, CI 0.70-0.91), but those preferring "other" languages, which were all languages with < 500 patients, had a statistically significant higher adjusted rate of admission (OR 1.35, CI 1.17-1.57).

conclusionsED patients with LEP experienced both increased rates of diagnostic testing and of hospital admission. Research is needed to examine why these differences occurred and if they represent inefficiencies in care.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersLanguageAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centersemergency roomhealth disparitieslimited English proficiency

Identifiers

PMID30187374
PMCPMC6258635
OpenAlexW2889916998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.