ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019
The Safety and Feasibility of Single-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05076279 (Safety and Efficacy of Single or Reduced Ports Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Single or Reduced Ports Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer (SPACE-01) Phase II Clinical Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Single-Incision Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Safe and Efficient for the Treatment of Malignant Hepatic Tumors? A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Three-year follow-up outcomes of postoperative quality of life from a randomized controlled trial comparing multi-port versus single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Robotic single-port versus multi-port distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative analysis of the da Vinci™ SP and Xi systems.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: succession of surgical techniques for novice surgeons.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Initial clinical experiences of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Da Vinci™ SP system: a single-center retrospective study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgery versus open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of left-sided three-port laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of conventional laparoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer treatment: Outcomes and prognosis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Single incision laparoscopic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Assessing the learning curve for transumbilical single-site laparoscopy for endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Initial experience with triple port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Current Status and Trends of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Korea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Effect of single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy guided by ERAS and the influence on immune function.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Comparative Analysis of Clavien-Dindo Grade and Risk Factors of Complications after Dual-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Safety Analysis of Apatinib Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- A Novel Valvuloplastic Esophagogastrostomy Technique for Laparoscopic Transhiatal Lower Esophagectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy for Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma-the Tri Double-Flap Hybrid Method.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Minimally invasive surgery is feasible after preoperative chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-port laparoscopic surgery maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic surgery by reducing damage of the abdominal wall. However, no comparative studies have addressed its application to gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We therefore aimed to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (SLG) for the treatment of AGC by comparing it with conventional multi-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (MLG).
methodsWe searched the prospective gastric cancer database of our institute for patients with AGC who underwent SLG or MLG between October 2007 and December 2013. Cases of R2 resection with distant metastasis or concurrent surgery for comorbid malignant lesions were excluded. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables, and the short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsWe identified 216 patients who underwent SLG (n = 100) or MLG (n = 116). After propensity score matching, we selected 73 pairs of patients who underwent SLG (distal gastrectomy, 49; total gastrectomy, 24) or MLG (distal gastrectomy, 45; total gastrectomy, 28). While the mean operative times were comparable between the groups, the SLG group had less blood loss, a lower postoperative morbidity, and shorter postoperative hospital stays. The 5-year survival rates were 74.2% in the SLG group and 60.2% in the MLG group (P = 0.081 by log-rank test).
conclusionsSLG is shown to be safe and feasible for the treatment of AGC, with better short-term results and acceptable oncologic outcomes and may be applicable for AGC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.