Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187323›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old.

Maria Carmen Lirosi, Flavio Tirelli, Alberto Biondi, Maria Cristina Mele, Cristina Larotonda, Laura Lorenzon, Domenico D'Ugo, Antonio Gasbarrini, Roberto Persiani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Perioperative Nutritional Management in Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Carmen LirosiDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Flavio TirelliDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy. tirelliflavio@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-5992
Alberto BiondiDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Maria Cristina MeleDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Cristina LarotondaDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Laura LorenzonDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Domenico D'UgoDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy.
Roberto PersianiDipartimento Scienze Gastroenterologiche, Endocrino-Metaboliche e Nefro-Urologiche, UOC di Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can effectively improve perioperative outcomes in surgical patients by reducing complication rates and hospital stay. However, its application in elderly patients has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection in our unit before and after the introduction of ERAS.

methodsFrom 328 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our unit over a 2-year period (2015-2016), 114 patients ≥ 75 years of age were selected. The patients were categorized according to perioperative treatment as pre-ERAS and ERAS patients (respectively, 53 vs 61 patients), and the groups were compared for statistical purposes. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel functions, oral feeding, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Compliance with the ERAS protocol was also measured.

resultsGroups were homogeneous for all the clinical-surgical variables, with the sole exception of the Charlson index, which was more severe in the ERAS group (p = 0.012). Compared with control patients, ERAS patients reported improved functional recovery (time to first flatus, stool, and oral feeding; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was reduced in ERAS patients overall and by side of resection, excluding rectal procedures. No differences were observed regarding postoperative complications. Of note, an optimal adherence to the protocol was reported, with 79% of items respected.

conclusionsERAS can be considered safe in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a high comorbidity index, providing a reduction in hospital stay and improving short-term postoperative outcomes. Finally, the protocol application was feasible, with a high adherence to the items in this subset of patients.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAgedAged, 80 and overColonic DiseasesDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleHumansLength of StayMalePerioperative CarePostoperative PeriodColorectal surgeryElderly patientsEnhanced recovery after surgeryERASOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID30187323
OpenAlexW2891519475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.