Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187288›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2018

A Review of the Pharmacological and Clinical Profile of Newer Atypical Antipsychotics as Treatments for Bipolar Disorder: Considerations for Use in Older Patients.

Akshya Vasudev, Sumit Chaudhari, Rickinder Sethi, Rachel Fu, Rachel M Sandieson, Brent P Forester

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Updates in Geriatric Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Elderly Bipolar Disorder.Current psychiatry reports · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Akshya VasudevDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. akshya.vasudev@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0423-4598
Sumit ChaudhariDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Rickinder SethiDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Rachel FuDepartment of Pharmacy, London Health Sciences Centre, A2-607, Victoria Hospital, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Rachel M SandiesonWestern Libraries, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Brent P ForesterDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Western University · CAHarvard University · USLondon Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder prevalence rates vary in the older adult population (defined as age ≥ 65 years), ranging from 1% in community dwellers to as high as 8-10% in hospital inpatients. Although older agents, including lithium and valproic acid, offer significant antimanic efficacy, as supported by a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), there is growing interest in using atypical antipsychotics to treat bipolar disorder in older adults. Newer atypical antipsychotics are of interest based on their tolerability and efficacy in the general adult bipolar population. The aim of this review was to systematically examine efficacy and tolerability of newer atypical antipsychotics for older adult bipolar disorder (OABD). We conducted a systematic search utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library electronic databases, with the aim of identifying all RCTs comparing newer atypical antipsychotics approved by the US FDA since 2002 (including brexpiprazole, cariprazine, lurasidone, iloperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, and aripiprazole) with placebo or another comparator, in the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder (including mania, depression or mixed episodes while used as an acute or maintenance treatment) in older adults (> 65 years). We found no RCT data on any of the examined agents. Hence, we changed our search criteria to include studies with a lower age cut-off (≥ 55 years), as well as the inclusion of post hoc studies. Two post hoc studies on lurasidone suggest its reasonable safety and efficacy profile in the acute and maintenance treatment of OABD; however, there are no pharmacoeconomic data on the use of lurasidone in the treatment of OABD. Research data from open-label studies on oral asenapine and aripiprazole as add-on therapy suggest that these two agents are adequately tolerated and improved symptoms of depression and mania in OABD; hence, there is an urgent need to conduct RCTs on these two agents. Lastly, we found no studies for the treatment of OABD with brexpiprazole, cariprazine, iloperidone, or paliperidone.

Indexed as

AgedAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30187288
OpenAlexW2891301257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.