Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30187273›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2019

Denosumab is effective toward glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients complicated with rheumatic diseases regardless of prior anti-osteoporotic drugs.

Naoki Iwamoto, Momoko Okamoto, Sosuke Tsuji, Yushiro Endo, Ayuko Takatani, Toshimasa Shimizu, Masataka Umeda, Shoichi Fukui, Remi Sumiyoshi, Takashi Igawa and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of glucocorticoids on osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Naoki IwamotoDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. naoki-iwa@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-0757
Momoko OkamotoDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Sosuke TsujiDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Yushiro EndoDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Ayuko TakataniDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Toshimasa ShimizuDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Masataka UmedaDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Shoichi FukuiDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Remi SumiyoshiDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Takashi IgawaDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Tomohiro KogaDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Shin-Ya KawashiriDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Toshiyuki AramakiDepartment of Rheumatology, Sasebo Chuo Hospital, Sasebo, Japan.
Kunihiro IchinoseDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Mami TamaiDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Hideki NakamuraDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Tomoki OriguchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Katsumi EguchiDepartment of Rheumatology, Sasebo Chuo Hospital, Sasebo, Japan.
Yukitaka UekiDepartment of Rheumatology, Sasebo Chuo Hospital, Sasebo, Japan.
Atsushi KawakamiDivision of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Unit of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the efficacy and safety of denosumab as treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) patients complicated with rheumatic diseases, by measuring patients' lumber bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. A total of 66 consecutive patients for whom denosumab was initiated between July 2013 and August 2016 were enrolled and evaluated for 12 months. All of the patients were treated with glucocorticoids for underlying rheumatic diseases. The clinical assessment included measurements of the BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry technique and the bone turnover markers N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTX) in urine, serum intact procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after the start of denosumab treatment. Adverse events (AEs) until 12 months were also analyzed. The mean percentage changes in BMD from baseline to 6 and 12 months were significant (2.85% increase, p < 0.0001 and 4.40% increase, p < 0.0001, respectively) regardless of the prior anti-osteoporotic drugs treatment (16 no transition from anti-osteoporotic drugs, 27 transition from bisphosphonate, 23 transition from teriparatide). The decreases in NTX, P1NP and BAP at 6 and 12 months were also significant. No serious AEs were noted. A multivariable logistic analysis showed that the prednisolone dose at baseline was associated with the clinical response to denosumab. In a real-world setting, denosumab was effective and safe for treating GIOP patients complicated with rheumatic diseases regardless of prior anti-osteoporotic drug treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingDenosumabDiphosphonatesFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOsteoporosisAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesGlucocorticoidsPeptide FragmentsProcollagenprocollagen Type I N-terminal peptideBisphosphonateBone turnover markersDenosumabGlucocorticoid-induced osteoporosisRheumatic diseaseTeriparatide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.