ArticleClinical oral investigations2019
Immediate implant placement following 1-year treatment with oral versus intravenous bisphosphonates: a histomorphometric canine study on peri-implant bone.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Systemic Drug Therapies (Bisphosphonates and Immunosuppressants) on Dental Implant Success: A Clinical Review.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Review
- Comparison of the Effect of Oral Versus Intravenous Bisphosphonate Administration on Osteoclastogenesis in Advanced-Stage Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Histomorphometric Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Response to Intravenous Administration of Zoledronate (ZometaMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Extensive protein expression changes induced by pamidronate in RAW 264.7 cells as determined by IP-HPLC.PeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBisphosphonates (BPs) are anti-resorptive medications with inhibitory effects on osteoclasts which decrease bone turnover. The present study aimed to assess the early effects of BPs on peri-implant bone. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve female mongrel dogs were assigned to one control and two experimental groups as follows: 12 months of oral alendronate (ALN, 3.5 mg/kg/week) or intravenous (IV) pamidronate (PAM, 1 mg/kg/week) for experimental groups. Following 8 weeks after implant insertion, the specimens were sacrificed, histological evaluation was performed, and C-terminal telopeptide of collagen I (CTx) analysis was performed on serums.
resultsPAM demonstrated the greatest marginal bone level (MBL), 2.64 ± 0.48, followed by ALN and control, 2.5 ± 0.4 and 0.66 ± 0.5 respectively. The least bone-implant contact was observed in PAM group (%39 ± 0.03) while it was significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.05). PAM and ALN demonstrated < 10 CTx levels versus > 300 in controls.
conclusionIt is assumed that long-term oral or IV BP therapy decreases marginal bone resorption and osseointegration. These changes were more accentuated in IV BP administration. CTx does not seem to be a precise predictor for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: BPs impair peri-implant bone remodeling and this phenomena may be effective for reducing resorption at esthetic zone implants; however, decrease in osseointegration may be a concern for implant treatment in patients receiving BPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.