ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2018
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation in a Non-Academic Setting: Two-Year Result.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcomes with hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Hypoglossal nerve stimulation long-term clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisUpper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is an FDA approved treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who could not adhere to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Previous studies have shown UAS reduced apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in controlled clinical trials and from academic institutions. We report patient outcomes and therapy adherence of UAS in a non-academic hospital and clinic setting. STUDY
designCase series of consecutive patients.
methodsConsecutive implants completed at a community hospital between January 2015 to Feb 2017 are included in this report. All patients underwent baseline polysomnography (PSG) recording and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) prior to the implant. All patients had returned for standard post-implantation titration PSG at a community sleep clinic to validate and adjust the stimulation setting for optimal response. Results were in mean ± SD, and pre- and post-implant data were compared using a paired student t-test.
resultsA total 22 patients undergoing UAS implant were overweight (BMI of 28.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) and middle aged (63.2 ± 11.1 years), and had severe OSA (AHI of 35.9 ± 19.1). The AHI from the entire night of the titration study was 16.0 ± 10.4 (
conclusionPatients who elected to receive UAS implant surgery at a non-academic hospital and followed at a sleep clinic showed significant reduction in OSA severity with strong adherence to treatment. These results supported that UAS as a valid treatment option for OSA can be successfully implemented in the non-academic hospital and clinic settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.