Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186954›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

Report and Recommendations of the Association of Pathology Chairs' Autopsy Working Group.

Gregory G Davis, Gayle L Winters, Billie S Fyfe, Jody E Hooper, Julia C Iezzoni, Rebecca L Johnson, Priscilla S Markwood, Wesley Y Naritoku, Marcus Nashelsky, Barbara A Sampson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Why Should Clinical Autopsies Continue to Exist?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Autopsies in pandemics - a perspective on barriers and benefits. Is it time for a revival?APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory G DavisForensic Division, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-296X
Gayle L WintersDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Billie S FyfeUMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jody E HooperDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Julia C IezzoniDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rebecca L JohnsonAmerican Board of Pathology, Tampa, FL, USA.
Priscilla S MarkwoodAssociation of Pathology Chairs, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Wesley Y NaritokuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, USC/LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marcus NashelskyDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
Barbara A SampsonCity of New York Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, NY, USA.
Jacob J SteinbergDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
James R StubbsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Charles TimmonsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Robert D HoffmanDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USJohnson University · USLAC+USC Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOffice of Chief Medical Examiner · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Virginia · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autopsy has been a foundation of pathology training for many years, but hospital autopsy rates are notoriously low. At the 2014 meeting of the Association of Pathology Chairs, some pathologists suggested removing autopsy from the training curriculum of pathology residents to provide additional months for training in newer disciplines, such as molecular genetics and informatics. At the same time, the American Board of Pathology received complaints that newly hired pathologists recently certified in anatomic pathology are unable to perform an autopsy when called upon to do so. In response to a call to abolish autopsy from pathology training on the one hand and for more rigorous autopsy training on the other, the Association of Pathology Chairs formed the Autopsy Working Group to examine the role of autopsy in pathology residency training. After 2 years of research and deliberation, the Autopsy Working Group recommends the following:Autopsy should remain a component of anatomic pathology training.A training program must have an autopsy service director with defined responsibilities, including accountability to the program director to record every autopsy performed by every resident.Specific entrustable activities should be defined that a resident must master in order to be deemed competent in autopsy practice, as well as criteria for gaining the trust to perform the tasks without direct supervision.Technical standardization of autopsy performance and reporting must be improved.The current minimum number of 50 autopsies should not be reduced until the changes recommended above have been implemented.

Indexed as

anatomic pathologyautopsyautopsy service directorentrustable activitiespathology trainingrapid autopsyresidency

Identifiers

PMID30186954
PMCPMC6117865
OpenAlexW2888918559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.