ArticleData in brief2018
The differentially mitochondrial proteomic dataset in human ovarian cancer relative to control tissues.
Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This data article presents a differentially mitochondrial proteomic dataset in human ovarian cancer tissues relative to control tissues. The mitochondrial samples were prepared from human ovarian cancer and control ovary tissues, and were digested with trypsin. The tryptic peptides from ovarian cancer and control mitochondrial samples were labeled by isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) reagents, followed by strong-cation exchange (SCX) chromatography, liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and bioinformatic analysis. This data article is related to a published article (Li et al., 2018) [1].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.