Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186700›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

BioWorkbench: a high-performance framework for managing and analyzing bioinformatics experiments.

Maria Luiza Mondelli, Thiago Magalhães, Guilherme Loss, Michael Wilde, Ian Foster, Marta Mattoso, Daniel Katz, Helio Barbosa, Ana Tereza R de Vasconcelos, Kary Ocaña and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Luiza MondelliNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thiago MagalhãesNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Guilherme LossNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Michael WildeComputation Institute, Argonne National Laboratory/University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ian FosterComputation Institute, Argonne National Laboratory/University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2129-5269
Marta MattosoComputer and Systems Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel KatzNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5934-7525
Helio BarbosaNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Tereza R de VasconcelosNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4632-2086
Kary OcañaNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luiz M R GadelhaNational Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-9522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in sequencing techniques have led to exponential growth in biological data, demanding the development of large-scale bioinformatics experiments. Because these experiments are computation- and data-intensive, they require high-performance computing techniques and can benefit from specialized technologies such as Scientific Workflow Management Systems and databases. In this work, we present BioWorkbench, a framework for managing and analyzing bioinformatics experiments. This framework automatically collects provenance data, including both performance data from workflow execution and data from the scientific domain of the workflow application. Provenance data can be analyzed through a web application that abstracts a set of queries to the provenance database, simplifying access to provenance information. We evaluate BioWorkbench using three case studies: SwiftPhylo, a phylogenetic tree assembly workflow; SwiftGECKO, a comparative genomics workflow; and RASflow, a RASopathy analysis workflow. We analyze each workflow from both computational and scientific domain perspectives, by using queries to a provenance and annotation database. Some of these queries are available as a pre-built feature of the BioWorkbench web application. Through the provenance data, we show that the framework is scalable and achieves high-performance, reducing up to 98% of the case studies execution time. We also show how the application of machine learning techniques can enrich the analysis process.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsData analyticsProfilingProvenanceScientific workflows

Identifiers

PMID30186700
PMCPMC6119457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.