Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186674›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Addressing cultural, racial and ethnic discrepancies in guideline discordant gestational weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kathryn M Denize, Nina Acharya, Stephanie A Prince, Danilo Fernandes da Silva, Alysha L J Harvey, Zachary M Ferraro, Kristi B Adamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn M Denize *School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Nina Acharya *School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Stephanie A PrinceDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Danilo Fernandes da SilvaDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Midwest/Parana (UNICENTRO), Guarapuava, Paraná, Brazil.
Alysha L J HarveySchool of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Zachary M FerraroFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Kristi B AdamoSchool of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the literature and describe the discrepancies in achieving the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines across cultures.

methodsTen databases were searched from inception to April 2018. Observational cohort studies were included that examined adult women; reported on a measure of culture; compared cultural groups, and reported on GWG. Articles were broken down into papers that used the current 2009 IOM GWG guidelines and those that used others. A meta-analysis was conducted for studies using the 2009 guidelines examining the prevalence of discordant GWG across cultural groups.

resultsThe review included 86 studies. Overall, 69% of women experienced discordant GWG irrespective of culture. White women experienced excessive GWG most often, and significantly more than Asian and Hispanic women; Black women had a higher prevalence of excessive GWG than Hispanic and Asian women; however, this difference was not significant.

conclusionsThe majority of women experience excessive GWG, with White women experiencing this most often. Culturally diverse GWG guidelines are needed to individualize antenatal care and promote optimal maternal-fetal health outcomes across cultural groups.

Indexed as

CultureEthnicityGestational weight gainInstitute of medicineMeta-analysisPregnancyRaceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30186674
PMCPMC6118200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.