Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186593›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2018

Manual therapy applied by general practitioners for nonspecific low back pain: results of the ManRück pilot-study.

Heidrun Lingner, Lena Blase, Anika Großhennig, Guido Schmiemann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heidrun Lingner1Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0367
Lena Blase1Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Anika Großhennig2Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Guido Schmiemann3Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Science, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nonspecific acute low back pain (LBP) is a common reason for accessing primary care. German guidelines recommend non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical activity as evidence-based treatments. Manual Therapy (MT) remains controversial. To increase evidence-based treatment options for general practitioners (GPs), a Pilot-Study was set up to gather information about the required conditions and setting for an RCT. Methods: The open pilot-study assesses recruitment methods for GPs and patients, timelines, data collection and outcomes of treatment immediately (T0) and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after consultation (T1, T2, T3). Inclusion criteria for GPs were: no experience of MT; for patients: adults between 18 and 50 suffering from LBP for less than 14 days.Study process: Patients' control-group (CG) was consecutively recruited first and received standard care. After GPs received a single training session in MT lasting two and a half hours, they consecutively recruited patients with LBP to the intervention group (IG). These patients received add-on MT.Primary outcomes: (A): timelines and recruitment success, (B): assessment tools and sample size evaluation, (C) clinical findings: pain intensity change from baseline to day 3 and time till (a) analgesic use stopped and (b) 2-point pain reduction on an 11-point scale occurred.Secondary outcomes: functional capacity, referral rate, use of other therapies, sick leave, patient satisfaction. Results: 14 GPs participated, recruiting 42 patients for the CG and 45 for the IG; 49% (56%) of patients were women. Average baseline pain was 5.98 points, SD: ±2.3 (5.98, SD ±1.8).For an RCT an extended timeline and enhanced recruitment procedures are required. The assessment tools seem appropriate and provided relevant findings: additional MT led to faster pain reduction. IG showed reduced analgesic use and reduced pain at T1 and improved functional capacity by T2. Conclusions: Before verifying the encouraging findings that additional MT may lead to faster pain reduction and reduced analgesic use via an RCT, the setting, patients' structure, and inclusion criteria should be considered more closely. Trial registration: Number: DRKS00003240 Registry: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS) URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/. Registration date: 14.11.2011. First patient: March 2012. Funding: the Rut and Klaus Bahlsen Stiftung, Hannover.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareYoung AdultGeneral practiceLow back painManual therapyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30186593
PMCPMC6120085
OpenAlexW2885288616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.