Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186483›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhi-Peng Wu, Pei Zhang, Jian-Zhong Bai, Yuan Liang, Jin-Shan He, Jing-Cheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhi-Peng WuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, P.R. China.
Pei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116044, P.R. China.
Jian-Zhong BaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116044, P.R. China.
Yuan LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, P.R. China.
Jin-Shan HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, P.R. China.
Jing-Cheng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of baricitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary effective outcome was the RA improvement to reach an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate. The safety outcomes were composed of clinical laboratory parameters. All patients included received 4 mg baricitinib once daily to treat RA for 12 or 24 weeks. The ACR20 response rate in the baricitinib group was significantly higher compared with that in the control group at 12 weeks [relative risk (RR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-1.94; P<0.00001] and 24 weeks (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.48-2.10; P<0.00001). Similarly, other effective outcome measures also exhibited significant improvements in the baricitinib group compared with those in the placebo group. Regarding the safety outcomes, no significant difference in adverse events (AEs) was identified at 12 weeks (P=0.14), but AEs were significantly higher in the baricitinib group compared with those in the control group at 24 weeks (P=0.03). Most laboratory values were significantly different between the baricitinib and placebo groups; however, the clinical significance of these changes remains to be determined. In summary, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that 4 mg baricitinib once daily was beneficial in patients with active RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biological DMARDs. More high-quality RCTs are required to determine the sustained efficacy and the safety of baricitinib.

Indexed as

baricitinibefficacyJanus kinase inhibitormeta-analysisrheumatoid arthritissafety

Identifiers

PMID30186483
PMCPMC6122435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.