ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Effects of imipenem combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide on the intestinal barrier in septic rats.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential therapeutic effect of3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Article
- Gadolinium chloride pre-treatment reduces the inflammatory response and preserves intestinal barrier function in a rat model of sepsis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Rifaximin Prevents T-Lymphocytes and Macrophages Infiltration in Cerebellum and Restores Motor Incoordination in Rats with Mild Liver Damage.Biomedicines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-infection therapy combined with immunotherapy is one of the important research approaches for treating sepsis. However, the combination of anti-infection and immunotherapy therapeutic agents may have an adverse effect on intestinal barrier function. In the present study, it was hypothesized that imipenem combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide (CTX) could improve the sepsis survival rate compared with imipenem treatment alone. In addition, the alterations in the intestinal barrier were investigated and the possible mechanisms of altering intestinal barrier function in septic rats treated with imipenem combined with low-dose CTX or imipenem alone were explored. To investigate the effect of imipenem combined with low-dose CTX on the intestinal barrier, the markers of histopathology, intestinal permeability, intestinal epithelial apoptosis, cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and tight junction proteins zonula occludens (ZO)-1, occludin and claudin-2, were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated. The results indicated that imipenem combined with low-dose CTX significantly improved the survival rate of rats compared with imipenem alone (P<0.05). However, no significantly difference between the treatment with imipenem combined with low-dose CTX and imipenem treatment alone was indicated with regard to histopathology, intestinal permeability, intestinal epithelial apoptosis and the expression of claudin-2, ZO-1 and TNF-α. However, imipenem combined with low-dose CTX significantly reduced IL-6 and IL-10 expression and significantly increased occludin expression compared with imipenem alone (P<0.05). It was concluded that imipenem combined with low-dose CTX could improve the survival rate of rats with sepsis compared with rats treated with imipenem alone. The present findings suggest that imipenem combined with low-dose CTX may cause damage to the intestinal barrier function and the mechanism may be associated with a reduction in IL-10 expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.