ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Species-Associated Differences in the Below-Ground Microbiomes of Wild and Domesticated
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key findings from 15 years ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Plant development influences dynamic shifts in the root compartment microbiomes of wild and domesticated finger millet cultivars.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- β-Aminobutyric acid promotes stress tolerance, physiological adjustments, as well as broad epigenetic changes at DNA and RNA nucleobases in field elms (Ulmus minor).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Microbiome properties in the root nodules ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Life at the borderlands: microbiomes of interfaces critical to One Health.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Isolation, molecular identification, and genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Defining Composition and Function of the Rhizosphere Microbiota of Barley Genotypes Exposed to Growth-Limiting Nitrogen Supplies.mSystems · 2022Article
- The rhizosphere bacterial community contributes to the nutritional competitive advantage of weedy rice over cultivated rice in paddy soil.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Differed Growth Stage Dynamics of Root-Associated Bacterial and Fungal Community Structure Associated with Halophytic PlantMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- The endophytome (plant-associated microbiome): methodological approaches, biological aspects, and biotech applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Breeding for Beneficial Microbial Communities Using Epigenomics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rhizosphere microbiome is known to play a crucial role in promoting plant growth, partly by countering soil-borne phytoparasites and by improving nutrient uptake. The abundance and composition of the rhizosphere and root-associated microbiota are influenced by several factors, including plant species and genotype. We hypothesize that crop domestication might influence the composition and diversity of plant-associated microbiomes. We tested the contribution of domestication to the bacterial and archaeal root and soil composition associated with six genotypes of domesticated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.