Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186217›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2018

Current Progress in CNS Imaging of Myotonic Dystrophy.

Martina Minnerop, Carla Gliem, Cornelia Kornblum

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Human brain pathology in myotonic dystrophy type 1: A systematic review.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 With Cerebellar Ataxia and Cerebellar Atrophy.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martina MinneropInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Carla GliemDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Cornelia KornblumDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging in myotonic dystrophies provided a major contribution to the insight into brain involvement which is highly prevalent in these multisystemic disorders. Particular in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1, conventional MRI first revealed hyperintense white matter lesions, predominantly localized in the anterior temporal lobe. Brain atrophy and ventricle enlargement were additional early findings already described almost 30 years ago. Since then, more advanced and sophisticated imaging methods have been applied in Myotonic Dystrophy Types 1 and 2. Involvement of actually normal appearing white matter and widespread cortical affection in PET studies were key results toward the recognition of diffuse and not only focally localized brain pathology

Indexed as

brainDTIfMRIMRImyotonic dystrophyneuroimagingPETVBM

Identifiers

PMID30186217
PMCPMC6110944
OpenAlexW2888322360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.