ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Predicting Fluency With Language Proficiency, Working Memory, and Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pauses, silences, and cognitive control: psycholinguistic markers of speech planning in interpreter training.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effects of Core Executive Function Training on Student Interpreters' Consecutive Interpreting.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of interpreting students' gestures and speech content on speech fluency of consecutive interpreting.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Lost in translation: Decoding the errors in consecutive interpreting by Chinese EFL learners.PloS one · 2025Article
- Informativeness across Interpreting Types: Implications for Language Shifts under Cognitive Load.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Speech errors in consecutive interpreting: Effects of language proficiency, working memory, and anxiety.PloS one · 2023Article
- Effects of executive functions on consecutive interpreting for Chinese-Japanese unbalanced bilinguals.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Synthetic Review of Cognitive Load in Distance Interpreting: Toward an Explanatory Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Language aptitude in the visuospatial modality: L2 British Sign Language acquisition and cognitive skills in British Sign Language-English interpreting students.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Effects of Directionality on Interpreting Performance: Evidence From Interpreting Between Chinese and English by Trainee Interpreters.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Differentiating Interpreting Types: Connecting Complex Networks to Cognitive Complexity.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Cognitive and Linguistic Predictors of Bilingual Single-Word Translation.Journal of cultural cognitive science · 2020Article
- The Predicting Power of Cognitive Fluency for the Development of Utterance Fluency in Simultaneous Interpreting.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Quantifying Interpreting Types: Language Sequence Mirrors Cognitive Load Minimization in Interpreting Tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneous interpreting (SI) is a complex bilingual verbal activity that poses great challenges for working memory (WM) and language proficiency. Fluency is one of the crucial indicators in evaluating SI quality, the violation of which is characterized by disfluency indicators such as interruptions, hesitations, repetitions, corrections, and blanks. To uncover factors underlying fluency in SI, 22 interpreting students performed a battery of tasks to test their language proficiency and WM. Two SI tasks, both from Chinese to English and from English to Chinese, were also conducted, and fluency was evaluated according to the five indicators. Two factors (language proficiency and WM) and the five objectively measured disfluency indicators were then used as input for a regression analysis in both directions to model factors underlying fluency in SI performance. The results reveal that, with fluency measured as a whole, WM and directionality yield a significant effect on fluency, and that WM is the only variable that predicts fluency in both directions, accounting for 50 and 51% of the variation in the occurrence of disfluencies in Chinese-English and English-Chinese interpreting, respectively. The findings clarify for the first time the role of language proficiency, WM, and directionality upon fluency in SI, indicating the critical role of WM capability as compared with language skills in fluent production. The research also supports the position that, for interpreting students, interpreting performance tends to be more fluent in the non-native to native language direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.