Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186204›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2018

Inhibitory Pathways for Processing the Temporal Structure of Sensory Signals in the Insect Brain.

Hiroyuki Ai, Ajayrama Kumaraswamy, Tsunehiko Kohashi, Hidetoshi Ikeno, Thomas Wachtler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroyuki AiDepartment of Earth System Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ajayrama KumaraswamyDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany.
Tsunehiko KohashiNeuroscience Institute, Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Hidetoshi IkenoSchool of Human Science and Environment, University of Hyogo, Himeji, Japan.
Thomas WachtlerDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects have acquired excellent sensory information processing abilities in the process of evolution. In addition, insects have developed communication schemes based on the temporal patterns of specific sensory signals. For instance, male moths approach a female by detecting the spatiotemporal pattern of a pheromone plume released by the female. Male crickets attract a conspecific female as a mating partner using calling songs with species-specific temporal patterns. The dance communication of honeybees relies on a unique temporal pattern of vibration caused by wingbeats during the dance. Underlying these behaviors, neural circuits involving inhibitory connections play a critical common role in processing the exact timing of the signals in the primary sensory centers of the brain. Here, we discuss common mechanisms for processing the temporal patterns of sensory signals in the insect brain.

Indexed as

cricketdisinhibitionduration codinghoneybeemothpostinhibitory reboundtemporal structurewaggle dance

Identifiers

PMID30186204
PMCPMC6110935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.