Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30186151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Biological Brain Age Prediction Using Cortical Thickness Data: A Large Scale Cohort Study.

Habtamu M Aycheh, Joon-Kyung Seong, Jeong-Hyeon Shin, Duk L Na, Byungkon Kang, Sang W Seo, Kyung-Ah Sohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Update on Neuroaging on Earth and in Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Habtamu M AychehDepartment of Software and Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.
Joon-Kyung SeongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeong-Hyeon ShinSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Duk L NaDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Byungkon KangDepartment of Software and Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.
Sang W SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung-Ah SohnDepartment of Software and Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain age estimation from anatomical features has been attracting more attention in recent years. This interest in brain age estimation is motivated by the importance of biological age prediction in health informatics, with an application to early prediction of neurocognitive disorders. It is well-known that normal brain aging follows a specific pattern, which enables researchers and practitioners to predict the age of a human's brain from its degeneration. In this paper, we model brain age predicted by cortical thickness data gathered from large cohort brain images. We collected 2,911 cognitively normal subjects (age 45-91 years) at a single medical center and acquired their brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. All images were acquired using the same scanner with the same protocol. We propose to first apply Sparse Group Lasso (SGL) for feature selection by utilizing the brain's anatomical grouping. Once the features are selected, a non-parametric non-linear regression using the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithm is applied to fit the final age prediction model. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves the mean absolute error of 4.05 years, which is comparable with or superior to several recent methods. Our method can also be a critical tool for clinicians to differentiate patients with neurodegenerative brain disease by extracting a cortical thinning pattern associated with normal aging.

Indexed as

agingcortical lobecortical thicknessGaussian processregression analysisROISparse Group Lasso

Identifiers

PMID30186151
PMCPMC6113379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.