ArticleThrombosis journal2018
COSIMO - patients with active cancer changing to rivaroxaban for the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a non-interventional study.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02742623 (COSIMO Cancer Associated Thrombosis - Patient Reported Outcomes With Rivaroxaban. A Non-interventional Study on Patients Changing to Xarelto® for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COSIMO Cancer Associated Thrombosis - Patient Reported Outcomes With Rivaroxaban. A Non-interventional Study on Patients Changing to Xarelto® for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Prevention of Recurrent VTE in Patients With Active Cancer.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venous Thromboembolism Management and Anticoagulation Opportunities in Cancer Patients.European cardiology · 2026Review
- DOACs or VKAs or LMWH - What is the optimal regimen for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- The relationship between self-efficacy and treatment satisfaction among patients with anticoagulant therapy: a cross-sectional study from a developing country.Thrombosis journal · 2022Article
- Cancer-Associated ThrOmboSIs - Patient-Reported OutcoMes With RivarOxaban (COSIMO) - Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
- The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis According to the Current Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study).Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
- Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020Review
- Venous Thromboembolism Treatment and Prevention in Cancer Patients: Can We Use Pills Yet?Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: an update.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Review
- Rivaroxaban and the EINSTEIN clinical trial programme.Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis · 2019Review
- Drug-Drug Interactions of 257 Antineoplastic and Supportive Care Agents With 7 Anticoagulants: A Comprehensive Review of Interactions and Mechanisms.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAround 20% of venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases occur in patients with cancer. Current guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as the preferred anticoagulant for VTE treatment. However, some guidelines state that vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are acceptable alternatives for long-term therapy in some patients if LMWHs are not available. LMWHs and VKAs have a number of drawbacks that can increase the burden on patients. DOACs, such as rivaroxaban, can ameliorate some burdens and may offer an opportunity to increase patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The
methodsCOSIMO is a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm cohort study that aims to recruit 500 patients in Europe, Canada and Australia. Adults with active cancer who are switching to rivaroxaban having received LMWH/VKA for the treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent VTE for at least the previous 4 weeks are eligible. Patients will be followed for 6 months. The primary outcome is treatment satisfaction assessed as change in the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) Burdens score at week 4 after enrolment compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes include treatment preferences, measured using a discrete choice experiment, change in ACTS Burdens score at months 3 and 6, and change in HRQoL (assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue questionnaire). COSIMO will collect data on patients' medical history, patterns of anticoagulant use and incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Study recruitment started in autumn 2016.
conclusionsCOSIMO will provide information on outcomes associated with switching from LMWH or VKA therapy to rivaroxaban for the treatment or secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in a real-life setting. The key goal is to assess whether there is a change in patient-reported treatment satisfaction. In addition, COSIMO will facilitate the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in preventing recurrent VTE in this patient population.
trial registrationNCT02742623. Registered 19 April 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.