Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Diagnostics of Data-Driven Models: Uncertainty Quantification of PM7 Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemical Method.

James Oreluk, Zhenyuan Liu, Arun Hegde, Wenyu Li, Andrew Packard, Michael Frenklach, Dmitry Zubarev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Uncertainty Quantification forChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James OrelukDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA.
Zhenyuan LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA.
Arun HegdeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA.
Wenyu LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA.
Andrew PackardDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA.
Michael FrenklachDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720-1740, USA. frenklach@berkeley.edu.
Dmitry ZubarevIBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California, 95136, USA.

Funding

DOE | National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) DE-NA0002375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report an evaluation of a semi-empirical quantum chemical method PM7 from the perspective of uncertainty quantification. Specifically, we apply Bound-to-Bound Data Collaboration, an uncertainty quantification framework, to characterize (a) variability of PM7 model parameter values consistent with the uncertainty in the training data and (b) uncertainty propagation from the training data to the model predictions. Experimental heats of formation of a homologous series of linear alkanes are used as the property of interest. The training data are chemically accurate, i.e., they have very low uncertainty by the standards of computational chemistry. The analysis does not find evidence of PM7 consistency with the entire data set considered as no single set of parameter values is found that captures the experimental uncertainties of all training data. A set of parameter values for PM7 was able to capture the training data within ±1 kcal/mol, but not to the smaller level of uncertainty in the reported data. Nevertheless, PM7 was found to be consistent for subsets of the training data. In such cases, uncertainty propagation from the chemically accurate training data to the predicted values preserves error within bounds of chemical accuracy if predictions are made for the molecules of comparable size. Otherwise, the error grows linearly with the relative size of the molecules.

Identifiers

PMID30185953
PMCPMC6125339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.