ArticleScientific reports2018
E-hooks provide guidance and a soft landing for the microtubule binding domain of dynein.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrostatics and disease: Large-scale assessment of human missense variants causing protein charge alterations and their implications for disease.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Deciphering the role of tubulin's C-terminal tail in kinesin binding using computational and clustering approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigating the Function of C‑Terminal Tails of Human Tubulin Isotypes in the Motility Regulation of Cytoplasmic Dynein.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Computational perspectives on tubulin E-hook structure and mechanisms.Biophysical reports · 2026Review
- Electrostatics in Computational Biophysics and Its Implications for Disease Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Long-range electrostatic interactions significantly modulate the affinity of dynein for microtubules.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Computational Study on E-Hooks of Tubulins in the Binding Process with Kinesin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- StructureMan: A Structure Manipulation Tool to Study Large Scale Biomolecular Interactions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Processivity vs. Beating: Comparing Cytoplasmic and Axonemal Dynein Microtubule Binding Domain Association with Microtubule.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- DFMD: Fast and Effective DelPhiForce Steered Molecular Dynamics Approach to Model Ligand Approach Toward a Receptor: Application to Spermine Synthase Enzyme.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Macromolecular binding is a complex process that involves sensing and approaching the binding partner, adopting the proper orientation, and performing the physical binding. We computationally investigated the role of E-hooks, which are intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) at the C-terminus of tubulin, on dynein microtubule binding domain (MTBD) binding to the microtubule as a function of the distance between the MTBD and its binding site on the microtubule. Our results demonstrated that the contacts between E-hooks and the MTBD are dynamical; multiple negatively charted patches of amino acids on the E-hooks grab and release the same positively charged patches on the MTBD as it approaches the microtubule. Even when the distance between the MTBD and the microtubule was greater than the E-hook length, the E-hooks sensed and guided MTBD via long-range electrostatic interactions in our simulations. Moreover, we found that E-hooks exerted electrostatic forces on the MTBD that were distance dependent; the force pulls the MTBD toward the microtubule at long distances but opposes binding at short distances. This mechanism provides a "soft-landing" for the MTBD as it binds to the microtubule. Finally, our analysis of the conformational states of E-hooks in presence and absence of the MTBD indicates that the binding process is a mixture of the induced-fit and lock-and-key macromolecular binding hypotheses. Overall, this novel binding mechanism is termed "guided-soft-binding" and could have broad-reaching impacts on the understanding of how IDRs dock to structured proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.