Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185866›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Genome-wide generation and genotyping of informative SNPs to scan molecular signatures for seed yield in chickpea.

Udita Basu, Rishi Srivastava, Deepak Bajaj, Virevol Thakro, Anurag Daware, Naveen Malik, Hari D Upadhyaya, Swarup K Parida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel Alleles fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrating genomics for chickpea improvement: achievements and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Udita BasuNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Rishi SrivastavaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Deepak BajajNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Virevol ThakroNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Anurag DawareNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Naveen MalikNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Hari D UpadhyayaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, 502324, Telangana, India.
Swarup K ParidaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. swarup@nipgr.ac.in.
National Institute of Plant Genome Research · INInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discovered 2150 desi and 2199 kabuli accessions-derived SNPs by cultivar-wise individual assembling of sequence-reads generated through genotyping-by-sequencing of 92 chickpea accessions. Subsequent large-scale validation and genotyping of these SNPs discovered 619 desi accessions-derived (DAD) SNPs, 531 kabuli accessions-derived (KAD) SNPs, 884 multiple accessions-derived (MAD) SNPs and 1083 two accessions (desi ICC 4958 and kabuli CDC Frontier)-derived (TAD) SNPs that were mapped on eight chromosomes. These informative SNPs were annotated in coding/non-coding regulatory sequence components of genes. The MAD-SNPs were efficient to detect high intra-specific polymorphic potential and wide natural allelic diversity level including high-resolution admixed-population genetic structure and precise phylogenetic relationship among 291 desi and kabuli accessions. This signifies their effectiveness in introgression breeding and varietal improvement studies targeting useful agronomic traits of chickpea. Six trait-associated genes with SNPs including quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) in combination explained 27.5% phenotypic variation for seed yield per plant (SYP). A pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene with a synonymous-coding SNP/QTN significantly associated with SYP trait was found most-promising in chickpea. The essential information delineated can be of immense utility in genomics-assisted breeding applications to develop high-yielding chickpea cultivars.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideCicerDNA, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesPhylogenyPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait LociWhole Genome SequencingDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID30185866
PMCPMC6125345
OpenAlexW2889273000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.