Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185610›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Tasting the unexpected: disconfirmation of expectations leads to lower perceived food value in an invertebrate.

F B Oberhauser, T J Czaczkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ants prefer the option they are trained to first.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of food odor in invertebrate foraging.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

F B OberhauserAnimal Comparative Economics Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg 93053, Germany felix.oberhauser@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9278-2497
T J CzaczkesAnimal Comparative Economics Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg 93053, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1350-4975
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To make sensible decisions, both humans and other animals must compare the available options against a reference point-either other options or previous experience. Options of higher quality than the reference are considered good value. However, many perceptible attributes of options are value-neutral, such as flower scent. Nonetheless, such value-neutral differences may be part of an expectation. Can a mismatch between the expectation and experience of value-neutral attributes affect perceived value? Consumer psychology theory and results suggest it can. To test this in a non-human animal, we manipulated a value-neutral aspect of a food source-its taste-while keeping its absolute value-its sweetness-the same. Individual ants (

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsAntsCitrusFeeding BehaviorPheromonesRosmarinusSucrosePheromonesSucroseassociative learningexpectation disconfirmationflower constancyincentive contrastsirrationalityvalue perception

Identifiers

PMID30185610
PMCPMC6170749
OpenAlexW2891443537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.