Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185463›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Attractor-like Dynamics in Belief Updating in Schizophrenia.

Rick A Adams, Gary Napier, Jonathan P Roiser, Christoph Mathys, James Gilleen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Functional neurological disorder, suggestion and virtual reality: neuroanatomical and computational perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Placebo Effect in Psychosis: Why It Matters and How to Measure It.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reduced grid-like theta modulation in schizophrenia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rick A AdamsInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom, rick.adams@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-8881
Gary NapierInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1077-0055
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-1228
Christoph MathysScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34136 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-5453
James GilleenDepartment of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London SE15 4JD, United Kingdom, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjects with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (Scz) overweight unexpected evidence in probabilistic inference: such evidence becomes "aberrantly salient." A neurobiological explanation for this effect is that diminished synaptic gain (e.g., hypofunction of cortical NMDARs) in Scz destabilizes quasi-stable neuronal network states (or "attractors"). This attractor instability account predicts that (1) Scz would overweight unexpected evidence but underweight consistent evidence, (2) belief updating would be more vulnerable to stochastic fluctuations in neural activity, and (3) these effects would correlate. Hierarchical Bayesian belief updating models were tested in two independent datasets (

Indexed as

CultureModels, NeurologicalProbability LearningSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPsychomotor PerformanceSchizophreniaYoung Adultattractor modelBayesianbeads taskdisconfirmatory biaspsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30185463
PMCPMC6705994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.