Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185425›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018

Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in old and very old adults with and without type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study.

Rafel Ramos, Marc Comas-Cufí, Ruth Martí-Lluch, Elisabeth Balló, Anna Ponjoan, Lia Alves-Cabratosa, Jordi Blanch, Jaume Marrugat, Roberto Elosua, María Grau and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rafel RamosInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain rramos.girona.ics@gencat.cat.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-5537
Marc Comas-CufíInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Ruth Martí-LluchInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Elisabeth BallóInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Anna PonjoanInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Lia Alves-CabratosaInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Jordi BlanchInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Jaume MarrugatRegistre Gironí del COR Group (REGICOR); Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Municipal Institute for Medical Research (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto ElosuaRegistre Gironí del COR Group (REGICOR); Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Municipal Institute for Medical Research (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
María GrauRegistre Gironí del COR Group (REGICOR); Cardiovascular, Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group (EGEC), Municipal Institute for Medical Research (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Marc Elosua-BayesInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Luis García-OrtizInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Primary Care Research Unit, the Alamedilla Health Center, Castilla and León Health Service-SACYL, and Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Maria Garcia-GilInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Catalonia, Spain.
Catalan Institute for Water Research · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESUniversitat de Girona · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether statin treatment is associated with a reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in old and very old adults with and without diabetes.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingDatabase of the Catalan primary care system (SIDIAP), Spain, 2006-15.

participants46 864 people aged 75 years or more without clinically recognised atherosclerotic CVD. Participants were stratified by presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and as statin non-users or new users.

main outcome measuresIncidences of atherosclerotic CVD and all cause mortality compared using Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusted by the propensity score of statin treatment. The relation of age with the effect of statins was assessed using both a categorical approach, stratifying the analysis by old (75-84 years) and very old (≥85 years) age groups, and a continuous analysis, using an additive Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsThe cohort included 46 864 participants (mean age 77 years; 63% women; median follow-up 5.6 years). In participants without diabetes, the hazard ratios for statin use in 75-84 year olds were 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.04) for atherosclerotic CVD and 0.98 (0.91 to 1.05) for all cause mortality, and in those aged 85 and older were 0.93 (0.82 to 1.06) and 0.97 (0.90 to 1.05), respectively. In participants with diabetes, the hazard ratio of statin use in 75-84 year olds was 0.76 (0.65 to 0.89) for atherosclerotic CVD and 0.84 (0.75 to 0.94) for all cause mortality, and in those aged 85 and older were 0.82 (0.53 to 1.26) and 1.05 (0.86 to 1.28), respectively. Similarly, effect analysis of age in a continuous scale, using splines, corroborated the lack of beneficial statins effect for atherosclerotic CVD and all cause mortality in participants without diabetes older than 74 years. In participants with diabetes, statins showed a protective effect against atherosclerotic CVD and all cause mortality; this effect was substantially reduced beyond the age of 85 years and disappeared in nonagenarians.

conclusionsIn participants older than 74 years without type 2 diabetes, statin treatment was not associated with a reduction in atherosclerotic CVD or in all cause mortality, even when the incidence of atherosclerotic CVD was statistically significantly higher than the risk thresholds proposed for statin use. In the presence of diabetes, statin use was statistically significantly associated with reductions in the incidence of atherosclerotic CVD and in all cause mortality. This effect decreased after age 85 years and disappeared in nonagenarians.

Indexed as

Primary PreventionAgedAged, 80 and overAtherosclerosisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30185425
PMCPMC6123838
OpenAlexW2890602507

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.