Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185361›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2018

Outcomes of rituximab therapy in refractory lupus: A meta-analysis.

Fatma Alshaiki, Elaf Obaid, Abdulqader Almuallim, Rabab Taha, Hadeel El-Haddad, Hani Almoallim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. [What is proven in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Lupus Nephritis in Children: Novel Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatma AlshaikiDepartment of Medicine, East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-7127
Elaf ObaidDepartment of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University School of Medicine, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-2862
Abdulqader AlmuallimDepartment of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University School of Medicine, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-0687
Rabab TahaDepartment of Medicine, Dr. Sloiman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2596-3079
Hadeel El-HaddadDepartment of Medicine, Dr. Sloiman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-8557
Hani AlmoallimDepartment of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University School of Medicine, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-8317
King Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConventional treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with damage accrual, hence increased morbidity rate. Off-label use of rituximab (RTX) has shown significant promise in this patient group; however, data are still controversial. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of RTX therapy in refractory lupus using a meta-analysis approach.

methodsElectronic search of the medical literature was conducted using a combination of relevant keywords to retrieve studies on the safety and efficacy of RTX in SLE and LN patients. Results were screened against our inclusion and exclusion criteria and two reviewers independently extracted the data for analysis. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to pool the data from individual studies and provide summary effect estimates.

resultsThirty-one studies that enrolled 1112 patients were finally eligible for the meta-analysis. The overall global, complete, and partial response rates to RTX therapy were 72%, 46%, and 32%, respectively. RTX significantly decreased Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) scores (p<0.001). Prednisone dose was significantly reduced after RTX treatment in both SLE and LN groups (p<0.001), and proteinuria was lowered in SLE (p<0.001) than in LN patients (p=0.07). Infection and infusion-related reactions were the most common side effects.

conclusionRTX therapy in refractory SLE and LN patients proved clinical efficacy and favorable safety outcomes. Larger well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID30185361
PMCPMC6072690
OpenAlexW2793890532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.