Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185225›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2018

Renal cancer: new models and approach for personalizing therapy.

Simona di Martino, Gabriele De Luca, Ludovica Grassi, Giulia Federici, Romina Alfonsi, Michele Signore, Antonio Addario, Laura De Salvo, Federica Francescangeli, Massimo Sanchez and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Simona di MartinoIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele De LucaDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Ludovica GrassiIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giulia FedericiIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Romina AlfonsiInstitute of General Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli e Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy.
Michele SignoreCentre of core facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Antonio AddarioDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Laura De SalvoIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Federica FrancescangeliDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Massimo SanchezCentre of core facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Valentina TirelliCentre of core facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni MutoDepartment of Urology, Humanitas University, Turin, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Steno SentinelliIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Manuela CostantiniIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Luca PasquiniCentre of core facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Michele MilellaIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Mustapha HaouiIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SimoneIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Michele GallucciIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ruggero De MariaInstitute of General Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli e Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy. ruggero.demaria@unicatt.it.
Désirée BonciIRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. desiree.bonci@iss.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClear cell RCC (ccRCC) accounts for approximately 75% of the renal cancer cases. Surgery treatment seems to be the best efficacious approach for the majority of patients. However, a consistent fraction (30%) of cases progress after surgery with curative intent. It is currently largely debated the use of adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients and the clinical and molecular parameters for stratifying beneficiary categories. In addition, the treatment of advanced forms lacks reliable driver biomarkers for the appropriated therapeutic choice. Thus, renal cancer patient management urges predictive molecular indicators and models for therapy-decision making.

methodsHere, we developed and optimized new models and tools for ameliorating renal cancer patient management. We isolated from fresh tumor specimens heterogeneous multi-clonal populations showing epithelial and mesenchymal characteristics coupled to stem cell phenotype. These cells retained long lasting-tumor-propagating capacity provided a therapy monitoring approach in vitro and in vivo while being able to form parental tumors when orthotopically injected and serially transplanted in immunocompromised murine hosts.

resultsIn line with recent evidence of multiclonal cancer composition, we optimized in vitro cultures enriched of multiple tumor-propagating populations. Orthotopic xenograft masses recapitulated morphology, grading and malignancy of parental cancers. High-grade but not the low-grade neoplasias, resulted in efficient serial transplantation in mice. Engraftment capacity paralleled grading and recurrence frequency advocating for a prognostic value of our developed model system. Therefore, in search of novel molecular indicators for therapy decision-making, we used Reverse-Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA) to analyze a panel of total and phosphorylated proteins in the isolated populations. Tumor-propagating cells showed several deregulated kinase cascades associated with grading, including angiogenesis and m-TOR pathways.

conclusionsIn the era of personalized therapy, the analysis of tumor propagating cells may help improve prediction of disease progression and therapy assignment. The possibility to test pharmacological response of ccRCC stem-like cells in vitro and in orthotopic models may help define a pharmacological profiling for future development of more effective therapies. Likewise, RPPA screening on patient-derived populations offers innovative approach for possible prediction of therapy response.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell LineageDisease Models, AnimalHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysBiomarkers, TumorPatient-derived xenograftsRenal cell carcinomaReverse phase protein array; personalized therapyTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30185225
PMCPMC6126022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.