Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185210›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention in Alzheimer's disease: a research proposal for a randomized controlled trial.

Elena M Marron, Raquel Viejo-Sobera, María Quintana, Diego Redolar-Ripoll, Daniel Rodríguez, Maite Garolera

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03121066 (Intervention Based on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Alzheimer's Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03121066 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Intervention Based on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Alzheimer's Disease Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaRan2027 to 2029Enrolled45ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsActive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena M MarronCognitive NeuroLab, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018, Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel Viejo-SoberaCognitive NeuroLab, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018, Barcelona, Spain. rviejos@uoc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-1906
María QuintanaBrain, Cognition and Behavior: Clinical Research, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica s/n, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.
Diego Redolar-RipollCognitive NeuroLab, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel RodríguezSant Llàtzer Day Hospital for Cognitive Impairment, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 6, 08221, Terrassa, Spain.
Maite GaroleraNeuropsychology Unit, Brain, Cognition and Behavior: Clinical Research, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica s/n, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlzheimer's disease is a major health problem in our society. To date, pharmacological treatments have obtained poor results and there is a growing interest in finding non-pharmacological interventions for this disease. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique that is able to induce changes in brain activity and long-term modifications in impaired neural networks, becoming a promising clinical intervention. Our goal is to study the benefit of individualized TMS targeting based on the patient's functional connectivity (personalized targeting), and short duration TMS protocol, instead of current non-individualized and longer session approaches. A double blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the effects of TMS treatment immediately, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the end of the intervention. Fifty-four patients with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease will be randomly allocated into experimental (active TMS), sham control, or conventional intervention control group. We will quantify changes in cognitive, functional, and emotional deficits in Alzheimer patients, as well as the functional connectivity changes induced by the TMS treatment.

resultsWe expect to demonstrate that personalized TMS intervention has a measurable positive impact in cognition, emotion, daily living activities and brain connectivity, thus representing a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Trial registration The trial has been prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03121066. Date of registration: 04/19/2017.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAlzheimer DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodHumansPrefrontal CortexQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer’s diseaseDorsolateral prefrontal cortexFunctional connectivityNon-invasive brain stimulationParietal cortexTheta burst stimulationTMSTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30185210
PMCPMC6126036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.