Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185197›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2018

Effectiveness of educational outreach visits compared with usual guideline dissemination to improve family physician prescribing-an 18-month open cluster-randomized trial.

Daniel Pinto, Bruno Heleno, David S Rodrigues, Ana Luísa Papoila, Isabel Santos, Pedro A Caetano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01984034 (An Open Cluster-randomized, 18 Month Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Educational Outreach Visits With Usual Guideline Dissemination to Improve Family Physician Prescribing), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01984034 naunknown statusnot on this map

An Open Cluster-randomized, 18 Month Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Educational Outreach Visits With Usual Guideline Dissemination to Improve Family Physician Prescribing

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Nova de LisboaRan2013 to 2015Enrolled200ConditionsInflammation, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsEducational Outreach Visits, Passive Dissemination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Replicating dissemination and identifying mechanisms of implementation of an empirically supported treatment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel PintoGrupo de Investigação Académica Independente - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. daniel.pinto@nms.unl.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-6824
Bruno HelenoGrupo de Investigação Académica Independente - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
David S RodriguesGrupo de Investigação Académica Independente - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Luísa PapoilaDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Isabel SantosGrupo de Investigação Académica Independente - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro A CaetanoGrupo de Investigação Académica Independente - Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

National Health Institute Dr. Ricardo Jorge (PT) 2011EXT577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEducational outreach visits are meant to improve the practice of health professionals by promoting face-to-face visits to deliver educational contents. They have been shown to change prescription behavior, but long-term effects are still uncertain. This trial aimed to determine if they improve family physician prescribing compared with passive guideline dissemination.

methodsParallel, open, superiority, and cluster-randomized trial. National Health Service primary care practices (clusters) were recruited in the Lisbon region-Portugal between March 2013 and January 2014. They could enter if they had at least four family physicians willing to participate and not planning to retire in the follow-up period. Three national guidelines were chosen for dissemination: acid secretion modifiers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and antiplatelets. Physicians in the intervention group received one 15 to 20 min educational outreach visit at their workplace for each guideline. Physicians in the control group had access to guidelines through the Directorate-General for Health's website (passive dissemination). Primary outcomes were the proportion of COX-2 inhibitors prescribed within the NSAID class and the proportion of omeprazole within the PPI class at 18 months after the intervention. A cost-benefit analysis was performed. Practices were randomized by minimization. Data analyses were done at individual physician level using generalized mixed-effects regression models. Participants could not be blinded.

resultsThirty-eight practices with 239 physicians were randomized (120 to intervention and 119 to control). Of 360 planned visits, 322 were delivered. No differences were found between physicians in the intervention and control groups regarding the proportion of omeprazole prescribed among PPIs 18 months after the visit (46.28 vs 47.15%, p = 0.971) or the proportion of COX-2 inhibitors among NSAIDs (12.07 vs 13.08%, p = 0.085). All secondary outcome comparisons showed no effect. There was no difference in cumulative drug costs at 18 months (3223.50€/1000 patients in the intervention group and 3143.92€/1000 patients in the control group, p = 0.848).

conclusionsEducational outreach visits were unsuccessful in improving compliance with guideline recommendations among Portuguese family physicians. No effects were observed at 1, 6, and 18 months after the intervention, and there were no associated cost savings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01984034 . Registered 7 November 2013.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Family PracticeFemaleHumansPhysicians, FamilyPortugalPrescriptionsStaff DevelopmentAcademic detailingCost-benefit analysisDrug utilizationEducational outreachFamily practiceGuideline adherenceProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30185197
PMCPMC6126017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.