ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018
The distribution of benefits under China's new rural cooperative medical system: evidence from western rural China.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding social integration and health outcomes among China's internal migrants: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Income-related benefit mobility before and after Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance integration: a longitudinal analysis of China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Impact of Enhanced Outpatient Pooling Level on Healthcare Utilization, Costs and Fund Expenditures in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Inequalities in Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure Measured Using Financing Incidence Analysis (FIA): A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Inequality in benefit distribution of reducing the outpatient cost-sharing: evidence from the outpatient pooling scheme in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploring health literacy in patients with chronic diseases in Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The impact of medical insurance reimbursement on postoperative inflammation reaction in distinct cardiac surgery from a single center.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Impact of the Integration of Urban and Rural Medical Insurance on Migrant Workers' Overwork: Evidence From China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China's new cooperative medical scheme.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Comparison of inequity in health-related quality of life among unemployed and employed individuals in China.BMC public health · 2021Article
- The Impact of Public Health Insurance on Household Credit Availability in Rural China: Evidence from NRCMS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Medical insurance and health equity in health service utilization among the middle-aged and older adults in China: a quantile regression approach.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- The Effect of New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme on the Socioeconomic Inequality in Inpatient Service Utilization Among the Elderly in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of chronic diseases and preventive care among adults aged 45 and older in Shaanxi Province, China.BMC public health · 2019Article
- The effect of China's new cooperative medical scheme on health expenditures among the rural elderly.International journal for equity in health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChina's New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) enables insured citizens to enjoy the same benefit package by paying a flat-rate premium. However, it still remains uncertain whether economically disadvantaged enrollees receive insurance benefits that at least match those of non-disadvantaged enrollees. This article, therefore, estimates the distribution of benefits under the NCMS across economic groups and compares the magnitude of economic-related inequity changes in the NCMS benefits.
methodsData were drawn from two-wave large-scale representative and comparable cross-sectional household health survey datasets conducted in Shaanxi Province in 2008 and 2013. In total, 9506 (2008) and 38,010 (2013) NCMS enrollees were included. The benefits from the NCMS are measured in two ways: via the probability of receiving reimbursements and via the absolute amount of the obtained reimbursements. Two-part models were used to estimate the benefit distribution and to adjust benefits for health care needs. Concentration curve, dominance test of the concentration curve, and concentration index (CI) were used to estimate the overall degree of economic-related inequality. The degree of horizontal inequity was estimated via indirectly standardized measures based on the "equal treatment for equal needs" concept.
resultsOur results indicate that economically affluent groups were more likely to receive reimbursements from the NCMS, and these reimbursements were also higher. Positive need-adjusted CIs for the probability of receiving reimbursements (CIs: 0.2027/0.1056 in 2008/2013) and the absolute amount of reimbursements (CIs: 0.3002/0.1660 in 2008/2013) further suggest the existence of clear pro-rich horizontal inequities in the benefits distribution under the NCMS. Encouragingly, a decreasing trend could be observed from 2008 to 2013, which suggests that horizontal inequities in NCMS benefits that favored the rich decreased over the investigated period, while the level of insurance benefits improved.
conclusionsOur study suggests that the benefits of NCMS are concentrated toward economically affluent groups. Although any trade-off between policy feasibility and equity has become a challenge for the formulation of social health insurance funding and benefit packages in developing countries, inequality can be gradually reduced through continuous adjustment of the medical insurance scheme, thus effectively targeting economically disadvantaged enrollees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.