Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185181›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

The distribution of benefits under China's new rural cooperative medical system: evidence from western rural China.

Sha Lai, Chi Shen, Yongjian Xu, Xiaowei Yang, Yafei Si, Jianmin Gao, Zhongliang Zhou, Gang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impact of Public Health Insurance on Household Credit Availability in Rural China: Evidence from NRCMS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sha LaiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Chi ShenSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Yongjian XuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaowei YangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Yafei SiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jianmin GaoSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China. gaojmxjtu@163.com.
Zhongliang ZhouSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76 West Yanta Road, P.O Box 86, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China. zzliang1981@163.com.
Gang ChenCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

China Medical Board 15-227China Medical Board 16-262Project of Shaanxi Social Science Foundation 2017S024Research Program of Shaanxi Soft Science 2015KRM117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina's New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) enables insured citizens to enjoy the same benefit package by paying a flat-rate premium. However, it still remains uncertain whether economically disadvantaged enrollees receive insurance benefits that at least match those of non-disadvantaged enrollees. This article, therefore, estimates the distribution of benefits under the NCMS across economic groups and compares the magnitude of economic-related inequity changes in the NCMS benefits.

methodsData were drawn from two-wave large-scale representative and comparable cross-sectional household health survey datasets conducted in Shaanxi Province in 2008 and 2013. In total, 9506 (2008) and 38,010 (2013) NCMS enrollees were included. The benefits from the NCMS are measured in two ways: via the probability of receiving reimbursements and via the absolute amount of the obtained reimbursements. Two-part models were used to estimate the benefit distribution and to adjust benefits for health care needs. Concentration curve, dominance test of the concentration curve, and concentration index (CI) were used to estimate the overall degree of economic-related inequality. The degree of horizontal inequity was estimated via indirectly standardized measures based on the "equal treatment for equal needs" concept.

resultsOur results indicate that economically affluent groups were more likely to receive reimbursements from the NCMS, and these reimbursements were also higher. Positive need-adjusted CIs for the probability of receiving reimbursements (CIs: 0.2027/0.1056 in 2008/2013) and the absolute amount of reimbursements (CIs: 0.3002/0.1660 in 2008/2013) further suggest the existence of clear pro-rich horizontal inequities in the benefits distribution under the NCMS. Encouragingly, a decreasing trend could be observed from 2008 to 2013, which suggests that horizontal inequities in NCMS benefits that favored the rich decreased over the investigated period, while the level of insurance benefits improved.

conclusionsOur study suggests that the benefits of NCMS are concentrated toward economically affluent groups. Although any trade-off between policy feasibility and equity has become a challenge for the formulation of social health insurance funding and benefit packages in developing countries, inequality can be gradually reduced through continuous adjustment of the medical insurance scheme, thus effectively targeting economically disadvantaged enrollees.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealthcare FinancingHealth Care SurveysHealth ExpendituresHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsBenefitChinaEquityHealth insuranceNew cooperative medical scheme

Identifiers

PMID30185181
PMCPMC6125950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.