Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185167›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Health promoting lifestyle of university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional assessment.

Khalid M Almutairi, Wadi B Alonazi, Jason M Vinluan, Turky H Almigbal, Mohammed Ali Batais, Abdulaziz A Alodhayani, Norah Alsadhan, Regie B Tumala, Mahaman Moussa, Ahmad E Aboshaiqah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Khalid M AlmutairiDepartment of Community Health Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wadi B AlonaziCollege of Business Administration King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jason M VinluanDepartment of Community Health Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Jvinluan@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-3580
Turky H AlmigbalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Ali BataisDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz A AlodhayaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Norah AlsadhanDepartment of Community Health Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Regie B TumalaCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahaman MoussaCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad E AboshaiqahCollege of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Ibrahim AlhoqailCollege of Medicine King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Saud University RG# 1435- 024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollege is a critical time where students are more prone to engage in risky health behaviors known to negatively affect well-being, such as physical inactivity, stress, and poor dietary habits. A health promoting lifestyle is an important determinant of health status and is recognized as a major factor for the maintenance and improvement of health. This study was designed to assess the health-promoting lifestyle of students in health colleges and non-health colleges in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA total of 1656 students participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. Data gathering was conducted from November 2016 to February 2017 at King Saud University. Participating students completed a self-reported questionnaire that included questions regarding their demographic characteristics and their health-promoting behaviors.

resultsThe majority of participants were females (70.4%), 20% of the participants were overweight and 11.3%, were obese. The analysis showed that there was a significant difference between health colleges and non-health colleges with regards to the factor of health responsibility. Students at both schools were found to have an inadequate level of adherence to recommendations regarding physical activity and healthy eating habits. The analysis also found that majority of the students in both colleges do not attend educational programs on health care. The model shows that gender, type of college, year in school, and family structure were significant predictors of the health lifestyle of students in Saudi Arabia.

conclusionThe results of the current study indicate that university students are leading unhealthy lives, where the majority of them have unhealthy eating habits and poor physical activity level. Universities are ideal settings for implementing health promotion programs. Therefore, planning and implementing programs to motivate students to be more responsible for their own health, to engage more in physical activity, and to practice healthy eating habits and other forms of wellness are of paramount importance.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealthy LifestyleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultHealth promoting lifestyleHealthy behaviorSaudi ArabiaStudents

Identifiers

PMID30185167
PMCPMC6126031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.