Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30185162›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Childbirth preferences and related fears - comparison between Norway and Israel.

Heidi Preis, Yael Benyamini, Malin Eberhard-Gran, Susan Garthus-Niegel

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Women's experiences of fear of childbirth: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heidi PreisBob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yael BenyaminiBob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Malin Eberhard-GranDepartment of Child Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Susan Garthus-NiegelDepartment of Child Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. susanniegel@gmail.com.
Tel Aviv University · ILAkershus University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research 165R-2011The Research Council of Norway 191098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFear of childbirth (FOC) could have significant impact on women's childbearing choices and experience. Culture affects the way women conceptualize childbirth, influencing the fears and expectations they may hold in relation to it. In the current study, we examined differences in childbirth preferences of cesarean section and use of epidural analgesia between Norwegian and Israeli pregnant women. Later, we used the Norwegian six-factor solution of the widely-used Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQ-A) to compare levels of the different FOC factors. Finally, we investigated differences in the associations between FOC and childbirth preferences between the two countries.

methodsSecondary analysis of two large surveys. Women from Israel (n = 490) and Norway (n = 2918) were recruited during prenatal check-ups in community clinics and a university hospital. At around 32 weeks of gestation, all participants filled out questionnaires, including the W-DEQ-A. Statistical analysis included exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, M/ANOVA, Spearman's Rho and Fisher's Z tests for the significance of the difference between independent correlations.

resultsThe Norwegian six-factor solution of the W-DEQ fit well with the Israeli data. Norwegian women were more concerned about loneliness, feeling less self-efficacy, negatively appraising birth, and lacking positive anticipation. Israeli women were more concerned about negative outcomes for the child and experienced greater general fear and fear of pain. Norwegian women preferred more cesarean sections compared to Israeli women, who preferred more epidural use than Norwegians. FOC factors were more strongly related to childbirth preferences among Norwegians.

conclusionsCultural differences between Israel and Norway are reflected by the differences seen in the levels of fear reported across the six factors. In Israel, birth culture is very medicalized, motherhood is highly revered, and there is an emphasis on having "perfect babies". In contrast, Norwegian women have fewer children, and birth is considered more natural. This could explain why Israeli women were more concerned that their child might be harmed during birth, while Norwegian women were more concerned with the physical and emotional expectations of birth.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Cultural ComparisonDelivery, ObstetricFearFemaleHumansIsraelNorwayParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesCesarean sectionChildbirth preferencesConfirmatory factor analysisCultural comparisonEpidural analgesiaFear of childbirthW-DEQ

Identifiers

PMID30185162
PMCPMC6126000
OpenAlexW2890280404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.