ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018
Childbirth preferences and related fears - comparison between Norway and Israel.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on fear of childbirth for pregnant women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Women's experiences of fear of childbirth: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluation of the relationship between birth beliefs and readiness for childbirth in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Tocophobia: Risk Factors, Consequences and Management - A Systematic Review of the Literature.Maedica · 2024Review
- Does the birth plan match what is relevant to women? Preferences of Spanish women when giving birth.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Respectful maternity care in Israel during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of associations between childbirth care practices and women's perceptions of care.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a digital questionnaire for the evaluation of perinatal psychosocial needs.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Fear of childbirth and its determinants in pregnant women in the third trimester: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- The Experience of Pregnancy and Childbirth Overshadowed by Obstetric Violence and Structural Barriers of the Israeli Health System from the Perspective of Arab and Jewish Women.Qualitative health research · 2023Article
- Childbirth fear in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic: key predictors and associated birth outcomes.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2023Article
- Effect of antenatal class attendance on fear of childbirth and antenatal stress.Revista de saude publica · 2023Article
- Does Obesity Influence Women's Decision Making about the Mode of Delivery?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A comparison of maternal fear of childbirth, labor pain intensity and intrapartum analgesic consumption between primiparas and multiparas: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2021Article
- The prevalence and predictors of fear of childbirth among pregnant Chinese women: a hierarchical regression analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Validation of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire for pregnant women in Malawi: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Specific relations of dimensional anxiety and manifest anxiety disorders during pregnancy with difficult early infant temperament: a longitudinal cohort study.Archives of women's mental health · 2020Article
- Couples' optimism, stress, and quality of life when undergoing fertility treatments: A cross-sectional study with prospective outcome assessment.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFear of childbirth (FOC) could have significant impact on women's childbearing choices and experience. Culture affects the way women conceptualize childbirth, influencing the fears and expectations they may hold in relation to it. In the current study, we examined differences in childbirth preferences of cesarean section and use of epidural analgesia between Norwegian and Israeli pregnant women. Later, we used the Norwegian six-factor solution of the widely-used Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQ-A) to compare levels of the different FOC factors. Finally, we investigated differences in the associations between FOC and childbirth preferences between the two countries.
methodsSecondary analysis of two large surveys. Women from Israel (n = 490) and Norway (n = 2918) were recruited during prenatal check-ups in community clinics and a university hospital. At around 32 weeks of gestation, all participants filled out questionnaires, including the W-DEQ-A. Statistical analysis included exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, M/ANOVA, Spearman's Rho and Fisher's Z tests for the significance of the difference between independent correlations.
resultsThe Norwegian six-factor solution of the W-DEQ fit well with the Israeli data. Norwegian women were more concerned about loneliness, feeling less self-efficacy, negatively appraising birth, and lacking positive anticipation. Israeli women were more concerned about negative outcomes for the child and experienced greater general fear and fear of pain. Norwegian women preferred more cesarean sections compared to Israeli women, who preferred more epidural use than Norwegians. FOC factors were more strongly related to childbirth preferences among Norwegians.
conclusionsCultural differences between Israel and Norway are reflected by the differences seen in the levels of fear reported across the six factors. In Israel, birth culture is very medicalized, motherhood is highly revered, and there is an emphasis on having "perfect babies". In contrast, Norwegian women have fewer children, and birth is considered more natural. This could explain why Israeli women were more concerned that their child might be harmed during birth, while Norwegian women were more concerned with the physical and emotional expectations of birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.