ArticleBiointerphases2018
Dealing with image shifting in 3D ToF-SIMS depth profiles.
Article in Biointerphases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Back to the basics of time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry of bio-related samples. I. Instrumentation and data collection.Biointerphases · 2023Article
- Advancements in ToF-SIMS imaging for life sciences.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Deep depth profiling using gas cluster secondary ion mass spectrometry: Micrometer topography development and effects on depth resolution.Surface and interface analysis : SIA · 2021Article
- Article
- ToF-SIMS 3D Analysis of Thin Films Deposited in High Aspect Ratio Structures via Atomic Layer Deposition and Chemical Vapor Deposition.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high sputter efficiency and low damage of gas cluster ion beams have enabled depth profiling to greater depths within organic samples using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). Due to the typically fixed geometry of the ion sources used in ToF-SIMS, as one digs into a surface, the position sampled by ion beams shifts laterally. This causes a lateral shift in the resulting images that can become quite significant when profiling down more than one micron. Here, three methods to compensate for this image shifting are presented in order to more accurately stack the images to present a 3D representation. These methods include (1) using software to correct the image shifts post-acquisition, (2) correcting the sample height during acquisition, and (3) adjusting the beam position during acquisition. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed. It was found that all three methods were successful in compensating for image shifting in ToF-SIMS depth profiles resulting in a more accurate display of the 3D data. Features from spherical objects that were ellipsoidal prior to shifting were seen to be spherical after correction. Software shifting is convenient as it can be applied after data acquisition. However, when using software shifting, one must take into account the scan size and the size of the features of interest as image shifts can be significant and can result in cropping of features of interest. For depth profiles deeper than a few microns, hardware methods should be used as they preserve features of interest within the field of view regardless of the profile depth. Software shifting can also be used to correct for small shifts not accounted for by hardware methods. A combination of hardware and software shift correction can enable correction for a wide range of samples and profiling depths. The scripts required for the software shifting demonstrated herein are provided along with tutorials in the supplementary material.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.