Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30184553›Full record

ArticleCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Effect of Combined Treatment with MLC601 (NeuroAiDTM) and Rehabilitation on Post-Stroke Recovery: The CHIMES and CHIMES-E Studies.

Nijasri C Suwanwela, Christopher L H Chen, Chun Fan Lee, Sherry H Young, San San Tay, Thirugnanam Umapathi, Annabelle Y Lao, Herminigildo H Gan, Alejandro C Baroque Ii, Jose C Navarro and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Current neuroprotective agents in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 19 institutions in 7 countries.

Nijasri C SuwanwelaChulalongkorn University, Chulalongkorn Stroke Centre, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Christopher L H ChenMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chun Fan LeeSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Sherry H YoungChangi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
San San TayChangi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Thirugnanam UmapathiNational Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital Campus, Singapore, Singapore.
Annabelle Y LaoSouthern Philippines Medical Center, Davao, Philippines.
Herminigildo H GanJose Reyes Memorial Medical Center, San Lazaro Compound, Manila, Philippines.
Alejandro C Baroque IiUniversity of Santo Tomas Hospita, Manila, Philippines.
Jose C NavarroJose R Reyes Medical Center, Neuroscience Institute St Luke's Medical Center, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Hui Meng ChangNational Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital Campus, Singapore, Singapore.
Joel M AdvinculaWest Visayas State University Medical Center, Iloilo, Philippines.
Sombat MuengtaweepongsaThammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Bernard P L ChanNational University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Carlos L ChuaPhilippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Nirmala WijekoonUniversity of Kelaniya, Annasihena Road, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
H Asita de SilvaClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Annasihena Road, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
John Harold B HiyadanBaguio General Hospital and Medical Centre, Baguio, Philippines.
Ka Sing Lawrence WongChinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Niphon PoungvarinSiriraj Hospital, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gaik Bee EowPenang Hospital, Jalan Residensi, George Town, Malaysia.
Narayanaswamy VenketasubramanianRaffles Neuroscience Centre, Raffles Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
CHIMES-E Study Investigators
Changi General Hospital · SGUniversity of Kelaniya · LKJosé R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center · PHKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · THNational University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGPenang Adventist Hospital · MYPrince of Wales Hospital · CNRaffles Institution · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGSiriraj Hospital · THTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGThammasat University · THUniversity of Baguio · PHUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Santo Tomas · PHUniversity of Santo Tomas Hospital · PHUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PHWest Visayas State University · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMLC601 has been shown in preclinical studies to enhance neurorestorative mechanisms after stroke. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether combining MLC601 and rehabilitation has an effect on improving functional outcomes after stroke.

methodsData from the CHInese Medicine NeuroAiD Efficacy on Stroke (CHIMES) and CHIMES-Extension (CHIMES-E) studies were analyzed. CHIMES-E was a 24-month follow-up study of subjects included in CHIMES, a multi-centre, double-blind placebo-controlled trial which randomized subjects with acute ischemic stroke, to either MLC601 or placebo for 3 months in addition to standard stroke treatment and rehabilitation. Subjects were stratified according to whether they received or did not receive persistent rehabilitation up to month (M)3 (non- randomized allocation) and by treatment group. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index were assessed at month (M) 3, M6, M12, M18, and M24.

resultsOf 880 subjects in CHIMES-E, data on rehabilitation at M3 were available in 807 (91.7%, mean age 61.8 ± 11.3 years, 36% female). After adjusting for prognostic factors of poor outcome (age, sex, pre-stroke mRS, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke onset-to-study-treatment time), subjects who received persistent rehabilitation showed consistently higher treatment effect in favor of MLC601 for all time points on mRS 0-1 dichotomy analysis (ORs 1.85 at M3, 2.18 at M6, 2.42 at M12, 1.94 at M18, 1.87 at M24), mRS ordinal analysis (ORs 1.37 at M3, 1.40 at M6, 1.53 at M12, 1.50 at M18, 1.38 at M24), and BI ≥95 dichotomy analysis (ORs 1.39 at M3, 1.95 at M6, 1.56 at M12, 1.56 at M18, 1.46 at M24) compared to those who did not receive persistent rehabilitation.

conclusionsMore subjects on MLC601 improved to functional independence compared to placebo among subjects receiving persistent rehabilitation up to M3. The larger treatment effect of MLC601 was sustained over 2 years which supports the hypothesis that MLC601 combined with rehabilitation might have beneficial and sustained effects on neuro-repair processes after stroke. There is a need for more data on the effect of combining rehabilitation programs with stroke recovery treatments.

Indexed as

AgedAsiaCombined Modality TherapyDisability EvaluationDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeuroprotective AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationDrugs, Chinese HerbalNeuroaidNeuroprotective AgentsAcute strokeClinical trialCombinationLong-term outcomeMLC601NeuroAiDRehabilitationStroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID30184553
PMCPMC6214602
OpenAlexW2892030841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.