Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30184283›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical nursing2019

Symptoms of apathy and passivity in dementia: A simultaneous concept analysis.

Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Laura Block, Rachel Johnson, Emilie Dykstra Goris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-3558
Laura BlockUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin.
Rachel JohnsonHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Emilie Dykstra GorisDepartment of Nursing, Hope College, Holland, Michigan.

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
Kenneth H. Campbell Foundation for Neurological ResearchNational Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing ExcellenceNational Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThe objective of this analysis was to clarify the concepts of apathy and passivity in the context of dementia by identifying distinguishing and overlapping attributes for both concepts simultaneously.

backgroundApathy is among the most common and persistent symptoms in dementia. The concept of apathy is often used interchangeably with passivity. Understanding similarities and differences between these concepts is of critical importance in clarifying clinical diagnostic criteria, developing consistent measurement in research and translating research evidence into nursing practice.

designA systematic literature search of multiple databases identified relevant articles for review. A modified combination of Haase et al.'s simultaneous concept analysis method and Morses' principle-based concept analysis using qualitative content and thematic analysis procedures was applied to identify overlapping and distinguishing attributes.

methodsA search of PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases identified 176 articles meeting inclusion criteria. The concepts of apathy and passivity were characterised using a standardised manual to identify attributes of definitions (conceptual and operational), related conditions, functional, behavioural and neurobiological correlates, antecedents and consequences. Thematic analysis identified common themes across each category which were tabulated and entered into comparative matrices to identify overlapping and distinguishing features.

resultsThere is considerable overlap across attributes of apathy and passivity. Apathy is distinguished as a clinical syndrome characterised by loss of motivation not due to emotional distress or cognitive impairment. Passivity is distinguished as a lack of interaction between the individual and environment in the context of cognitive impairment.

conclusionIn contrast to passivity, apathy is a more robustly defined concept focused on motivational limitations within the individual associated with specific neuroanatomical deficits. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The identification of key distinguishing features of apathy and passivity in dementia is a critical first step in ensuring consistent measurement of each concept.

Indexed as

ApathyDementiaHumansapathyconcept analysisdementianeuropsychiatric symptomspassivity

Identifiers

PMID30184283
PMCPMC6326867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.