Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30184058›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Bayesian integrative model for multi-omics data with missingness.

Zhou Fang, Tianzhou Ma, Gong Tang, Li Zhu, Qi Yan, Ting Wang, Juan C Celedón, Wei Chen, George C Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Integrative Analysis of Multimodal Omics Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Multivariate Bayesian variable selection for multi-trait genetic fine mapping.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi Omics Applications in Biological Systems.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhou FangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Tianzhou MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Gong TangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Li ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Qi YanDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA.
Ting WangDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA.
Juan C CeledónDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
George C TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

Epigenetic Variation and Childhood Asthma in Puerto RicansR01HL117191 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CELEDON, JUAN CARLOS · 2013 to 2020
$5.8M
Exposure to violence, epigenetic variation, and asthma in Puerto Rican childrenR01MD011764 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CELEDON, JUAN CARLOS · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
Power calculation and design issues in next-generation sequencingR01CA190766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TSENG, GEORGE C. · 2015 to 2018
$876k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190766NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117191NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Integrative analysis of multi-omics data from different high-throughput experimental platforms provides valuable insight into regulatory mechanisms associated with complex diseases, and gains statistical power to detect markers that are otherwise overlooked by single-platform omics analysis. In practice, a significant portion of samples may not be measured completely due to insufficient tissues or restricted budget (e.g. gene expression profile are measured but not methylation). Current multi-omics integrative methods require complete data. A common practice is to ignore samples with any missing platform and perform complete case analysis, which leads to substantial loss of statistical power. Methods: In this article, inspired by the popular Integrative Bayesian Analysis of Genomics data (iBAG), we propose a full Bayesian model that allows incorporation of samples with missing omics data. Results: Simulation results show improvement of the new full Bayesian approach in terms of outcome prediction accuracy and feature selection performance when sample size is limited and proportion of missingness is large. When sample size is large or the proportion of missingness is low, incorporating samples with missingness may introduce extra inference uncertainty and generate worse prediction and feature selection performance. To determine whether and how to incorporate samples with missingness, we propose a self-learning cross-validation (CV) decision scheme. Simulations and a real application on child asthma dataset demonstrate superior performance of the CV decision scheme when various types of missing mechanisms are evaluated. Availability and implementation: Freely available on the GitHub at https://github.com/CHPGenetics/FBM. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenomicsTranscriptomeHumansResearch DesignSample Size

Identifiers

PMID30184058
PMCPMC6223369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.