Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183843›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2018

Sampling plan in health surveys, city of São Paulo, Brazil, 2015.

Maria Cecilia Goi Porto Alves, Maria Mercedes Loureiro Escuder, Moises Goldbaum, Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros, Regina Mara Fisberg, Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Population-Based Health Survey in the municipality of São Paulo 2024: methodological and operational aspects.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Common mental disorders in São Paulo city, 2003-2015: population-based serial cross-sectional panel studies.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Cecilia Goi Porto AlvesInstituto de Saúde. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Mercedes Loureiro EscuderInstituto de Saúde. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Moises GoldbaumUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo BarrosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Regina Mara FisbergUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Chester Luiz Galvão CesarUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the sampling plan of the Health Survey of the City of São Paulo (ISA-Capital 2015) regarding the accuracy of estimates and the conformation of domains of study by the Health Coordinations of the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

methodsWe have described the population, domains of study, and sampling procedures, including stratification, calculation of sample size, and random selection of sample units, of the Health Survey of the City of São Paulo, 2015. The estimates of proportions were analyzed in relation to precision using the coefficient of variation and the design effect. We considered suitable the coefficients below 30% at the regional level and 20% at the city level and the estimates of the design effect below 1.5. We considered suitable the strategy of establishing the Health Coordinations as domains after verifying that, within the coordinations, the estimates of proportions for the age and sex groups had the minimum acceptable precision. The estimated parameters were related to the subjects of use of services, morbidity, and self-assessment of health.

resultsA total of 150 census tracts were randomly selected, 30 in each Health Coordination, 5,469 households were randomly selected and visited, and 4,043 interviews were conducted. Of the 115 estimates made for the domains of study, 97.4% presented coefficients of variation below 30%, and 82.6% were below 20%. Of the 24 estimates made for the total of the city, 23 presented coefficient of variation below 20%. More than two-thirds of the estimates of the design effect were below 1.5, which was estimated in the sample size calculation, and the design effect was below 2.0 for 88%.

conclusionsThe ISA-Capital 2015 sample generated estimates at the predicted levels of precision at both the city and regional levels. The decision to establish the regional health coordinations of the city of São Paulo as domains of study was adequate.

Indexed as

MorbiditySelf-AssessmentAdolescentAdultBrazilChildFemaleHealth ServicesHealth SurveysHumansMaleSampling StudiesUrban PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30183843
PMCPMC6122877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.