Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183789›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2018

3D microfluidic ex vivo culture of organotypic tumor spheroids to model immune checkpoint blockade.

Amir R Aref, Marco Campisi, Elena Ivanova, Andrew Portell, Dalia Larios, Brandon P Piel, Natasha Mathur, Chensheng Zhou, Raven Vlahos Coakley, Alan Bartels and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Integration of microphysiological systems with computational and digital twin modeling for pharmaceutical development: a systematic review.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advanced Microfluidics for Single Cell-Based Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Amir R ArefDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA. rwjenkins@partners.org.
Marco Campisi
Elena Ivanova
Andrew Portell
Dalia Larios
Brandon P Piel
Natasha Mathur
Chensheng Zhou
Raven Vlahos Coakley
Alan Bartels
Michaela Bowden
Zach Herbert
Sarah Hill
Sean Gilhooley
Jacob Carter
Israel Cañadas
Tran C Thai
Shunsuke Kitajima
Valeria Chiono
Cloud P Paweletz
David A Barbie
Roger D Kamm
Russell W Jenkins

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
Targeting the cytokine circuitry of KRAS-driven lung cancerR01CA190394 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI David A Barbie · 2015 to 2026
$4.5M
Development of Physiologic Tissue Models to Assess Tumor Explant Response to Immune Checkpoint BlockadeU01CA214381 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BARBIE, DAVID A, KAMM, ROGER D · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190394NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic culture has the potential to revolutionize cancer diagnosis and therapy. Indeed, several microdevices are being developed specifically for clinical use to test novel cancer therapeutics. To be effective, these platforms need to replicate the continuous interactions that exist between tumor cells and non-tumor cell elements of the tumor microenvironment through direct cell-cell or cell-matrix contact or by the secretion of signaling factors such as cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. Given the challenges of personalized or precision cancer therapy, especially with the advent of novel immunotherapies, a critical need exists for more sophisticated ex vivo diagnostic systems that recapitulate patient-specific tumor biology with the potential to predict response to immune-based therapies in real-time. Here, we present details of a method to screen for the response of patient tumors to immune checkpoint blockade therapy, first reported in Jenkins et al. Cancer Discovery, 2018, 8, 196-215, with updated evaluation of murine- and patient-derived organotypic tumor spheroids (MDOTS/PDOTS), including evaluation of the requirement for 3D microfluidic culture in MDOTS, demonstration of immune-checkpoint sensitivity of PDOTS, and expanded evaluation of tumor-immune interactions using RNA-sequencing to infer changes in the tumor-immune microenvironment. We also examine some potential improvements to current systems and discuss the challenges in translating such diagnostic assays to the clinic.

Indexed as

ImmunityLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorMiceSpheroids, Cellular

Identifiers

PMID30183789
PMCPMC6274590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.