Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Fluorinated methacrylamide chitosan hydrogel dressings enhance healing in an acute porcine wound model.

Pritam S Patil, M Michelle Evancho-Chapman, Hang Li, He Huang, Richard L George, Leah P Shriver, Nic D Leipzig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Optimization of Oxygen Delivery Within Hydrogels.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptive expression of biofilm regulators and adhesion factors ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pritam S PatilDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-8428
M Michelle Evancho-ChapmanDepartment of Surgery, Summa Health Systems-Akron Campus, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Hang LiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
He HuangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Richard L GeorgeDepartment of Surgery, Summa Health Systems-Akron Campus, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Leah P ShriverDepartment of Chemistry, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Nic D LeipzigDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6356-7691
University of Akron · USSumma Health System · US

Funding

Adaptable Hydrogel Oxygen Delivery Platform for Wound CareR15GM104851 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF AKRON · PI LEIPZIG, NIC D · 2013 to 2013
$358k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM104851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing involves multiple interrelated processes required to lead to successful healing outcomes. Phagocytosis, inflammation, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, energy production, and collagen synthesis are all directly or indirectly dependent on oxygen. Along with other critical factors, such as nutrition and comorbidities, availability of oxygen is a key determinant of healing success. Previously, we have presented a novel oxygenated hydrogel material that can be made into dressings for continuous localized oxygen delivery to wounds. In this study, an acute porcine wound model was used to test the healing benefits of these oxygenated MACF (MACF + O2) hydrogel dressings compared to controls, which included commercial Derma-GelTM hydrogel dressings. Wound closure and histological analyses were performed to assess re-epithelialization, collagen synthesis, angiogenesis, and keratinocyte maturation. Results from these assays revealed that wounds treated with MACF + O2 hydrogel dressings closed faster as compared to Derma-Gel (p<0.05). Targeted metabolomics via liquid chromatography separation and mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS) and a biochemical assay determined the concentration of hydroxyproline in wound samples at days 14 and 21, showing that MACF + O2 hydrogel dressings improved wound healing via an upregulated collagen synthesis pathway as compared to Derma-Gel (p<0.05). Histological evidence showed that MACF + O2 hydrogel dressings improve new blood vessel formation and keratinocyte maturation over all other treatments.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesBandagesChitosanFluorocarbon PolymersHydrogelsAcute DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalSwineWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAcrylamidesChitosanFluorocarbon PolymersHydrogelsmethacrylamide

Identifiers

PMID30183754
PMCPMC6124756
OpenAlexW2890909893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.