Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

SAS score: Targeting high-specificity for efficient population-wide monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea.

Alexandru Topîrceanu, Mihai Udrescu, Lucreţia Udrescu, Carmen Ardelean, Rodica Dan, Daniela Reisz, Stefan Mihaicuta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandru TopîrceanuDepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Politehnica University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Mihai UdrescuDepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Politehnica University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-9240
Lucreţia UdrescuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Carmen ArdeleanDepartment of Pulmonology, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Rodica DanDepartment of Cardiology, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Daniela ReiszDepartment of Neurology, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Stefan MihaicutaDepartment of Pulmonology, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8897-8342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

proposalThis paper investigates a novel screening tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS), which aims at efficient population-wide monitoring. To this end, we introduce SASscore which provides better OSAS prediction specificity while maintaining a high sensitivity.

methodsWe process a cohort of 2595 patients from 4 sleep laboratories in Western Romania, by recording over 100 sleep, breathing, and anthropometric measurements per patient; using this data, we compare our SASscore with state of the art scores STOP-Bang and NoSAS through area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). We also evaluate the performance of SASscore by considering different Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) diagnosis cut-off points and show that custom refinements are possible by changing the score's threshold.

resultsSASscore takes decimal values within the interval (2, 7) and varies linearly with AHI; it is based on standardized measures for BMI, neck circumference, systolic blood pressure and Epworth score. By applying the STOP-Bang and NoSAS questionnaires, as well as the SASscore on the patient cohort, we respectively obtain the AUC values of 0.69 (95% CI 0.66-0.73, p < 0.001), 0.66 (95% CI 0.63-0.68, p < 0.001), and 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75, p < 0.001), with sensitivities values of 0.968, 0.901, 0.829, and specificity values of 0.149, 0.294, 0.359, respectively. Additionally, we cross-validate our score with a second independent cohort of 231 patients confirming the high specificity and good sensitivity of our score. When raising SASscore's diagnosis cut-off point from 3 to 3.7, both sensitivity and specificity become roughly 0.6.

conclusionsIn comparison with the existing scores, SASscore is a more appropriate screening tool for monitoring large populations, due to its improved specificity. Our score can be tailored to increase either sensitivity or specificity, while balancing the AUC value.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeckPolysomnographySensitivity and SpecificitySleepSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30183715
PMCPMC6124708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.