ArticlePloS one2018
Understanding meta-population trends of the Australian fur seal, with insights for adaptive monitoring.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extreme weather effects on marine predator breeding outcomes in a global climate change hotspot.Science advances · 2026Article
- Uncovering Hidden Predators: Thermal Drone Detection of Antarctic Fur Seals in Tussac Grass at South Georgia.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Declining Abundance and Variable Condition of Fur Seal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Habitat selection and influence on hunting success in female Australian fur seals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spatio-temporal metapopulation trends: The coconut crabs of Zanzibar.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Niche partitioning and individual specialisation in resources and space use of sympatric fur seals at their range margin.Oecologia · 2024Article
- Environmental correlates of temporal variation in the prey species of Australian fur seals inferred from scat analysis.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Environmental influences on breeding biology and pup production in Australian fur seals.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Sustained reduction in numbers of Australian fur seal pups: Implications for future population monitoring.PloS one · 2022Article
- Carriage of antibiotic resistant bacteria in endangered and declining Australian pinniped pups.PloS one · 2022Article
- Influence of environmental variation on spatial distribution and habitat-use in a benthic foraging marine predator.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Declines and recovery in endangered Galapagos pinnipeds during the El Niño event.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- The northernmost haulout site of South American sea lions and fur seals in the western South Atlantic.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Environmental influences on foraging effort, success and efficiency in female Australian fur seals.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective ecosystem-based management requires estimates of abundance and population trends of species of interest. Trend analyses are often limited due to sparse or short-term abundance estimates for populations that can be logistically difficult to monitor over time. Therefore it is critical to assess regularly the quality of the metrics in long-term monitoring programs. For a monitoring program to provide meaningful data and remain relevant, it needs to incorporate technological improvements and the changing requirements of stakeholders, while maintaining the integrity of the data. In this paper we critically examine the monitoring program for the Australian fur seal (AFS) Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus as an example of an ad-hoc monitoring program that was co-ordinated across multiple stakeholders as a range-wide census of live pups in the Austral summers of 2002, 2007 and 2013. This 5-yearly census, combined with historic counts at individual sites, successfully tracked increasing population trends as signs of population recovery up to 2007. The 2013 census identified the first reduction in AFS pup numbers (14,248 live pups, -4.2% change per annum since 2007), however we have limited information to understand this change. We analyse the trends at breeding colonies and perform a power analysis to critically examine the reliability of those trends. We then assess the gaps in the monitoring program and discuss how we may transition this surveillance style program to an adaptive monitoring program than can evolve over time and achieve its goals. The census results are used for ecosystem-based modelling for fisheries management and emergency response planning. The ultimate goal for this program is to obtain the data we need with minimal cost, effort and impact on the fur seals. In conclusion we identify the importance of power analyses for interpreting trends, the value of regularly assessing long-term monitoring programs and proper design so that adaptive monitoring principles can be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.