Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30183560›Full record

ArticleZebrafish2018

An Open-Source Husbandry Repository.

Christopher Mark LaCoursiere, Jeremy F P Ullmann, Annapurna Poduri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zebrafish, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher Mark LaCoursiere1 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeremy F P Ullmann1 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Annapurna Poduri1 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

PCDH19-related Epilepsy-Human Genotype-Phenotype Studies Lead to Zebrafish StudiesR01NS100766 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI PODURI, ANNAPURNA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic databases provide effective and efficient management of zebrafish colony operations, but commercially available options are expensive. In this study we have developed a free zebrafish management repository alternative using free Google applications. Husbandry information is logged into a Google Sheets-based catalog through Google Form (GF) entries. Form autopopulation can be streamlined by barcodes, which can be generated and deciphered through free smartphone applications. The repository is capable of calculating pertinent husbandry dates from GF input and sending e-mail reminders to users for specified tasks. A Google application-based repository allows for a free simple zebrafish husbandry management solution.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualInformation ManagementZebrafishAnimal HusbandryAnimalsInternetSearch EngineSmartphoneanimal modeldatabasehusbandryopen sourcezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID30183560
PMCPMC6426270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.